MODEL OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COLLABORATIVE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES (AKIT) BASED ON SOCIAL CAPITAL IN ENHANCING REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS

Main Article Content

Sujianto .
Syofian .
Ikhsan .

Keywords

Abstract

Purpose of the study:The purpose of this study is to see the potential of local institutional development occupied by the  Akit tribe society in Riau.


Methodology:The method used with a qualitative approach in the search for truth of what models are suitable for the tribal society in improving regional competitiveness in Riau. This method is taken to describe the meaning of social capital in the  Akit tribe society by interviewing, observing, and participating of researchers in institutional activities.


Main Findings:Based on the results of the potential study at the locus of the study are found that the potential of social capital and economic potential which could be a tool to make local organizations can be competitive.


Applications of this study:This study is very important to provide information in the context of development at the local level.


Novelty:Only a very few have examined the local institutional development, especially Akit tribe society in Riau.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 44 | PDF Downloads 18

References

1. Andrey AKHREMENKO. (2017). Barriers to Institutional Development in Europe. Social Sciences, 48(004), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.21557/SSC.50041063
2. Andrianyta, H. H. and H. (2012). Penguatan Kelembagaan Dan Pembiayaan Pertanian Di Perdesaan. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 10(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v10n2.2012.143-158
3. Asadullah, M. N., & Ara, J. (2016). Evaluating the long-run impact of an innovative anti-poverty programme: evidence using household panel data. Applied Economics, 48(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1073846
4. Bach, T. (2012). The involvement of agencies in policy formulation: Explaining variation in policy autonomy of federal agencies in Germany. Policy and Society, 31(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.07.003
5. Badri, M. (2016). Pembangunan Pedesaan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (Studi pada Gerakan Desa Membangun). Jurnal Risalah, 27(2), 62–73.
6. Bakar, B. A., & Fauzi, E. (2013). Provinsi Aceh Study on Rubber Farmer ’ Characteristics in Determining the Type of Marketing Institution in Aceh, 12(2), 165–176.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4–5), 311–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8
8. Braunack-Mayer, A., & Louise, J. (2008). The ethics of Community Empowerment: tensions in health promotion theory and practice. Promotion & Education, 15(3), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1025382308095648
9. Coleman, James, S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Captial. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(1988), 95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723.
10. Jeanmonod, D. J., & Rebecca. (2018). We are IntechOpen, the world ’ s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists TOP 1 % Control of a Proportional Hydraulic System. Intech Open, 2, 64. https://doi.org/10.5772/32009
11. Jurkevičienė, J., & Butkevičienė, E. (2018). Social Capital in Social Media Networks. Filosofija. Sociologija, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v29i2.3705
12. Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 28(4), 485–487. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs.2011.100352
13. Prasetyono, D. W., Juni, S., & Astuti, W. (2017). Pemberdayaan Petani, 02(03), 231–238.
14. Putnam, R. D. (2016). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Culture and Politics: A Reader, 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6
15. Sciences, S., & Gen, M. (2017). Impact of Social Capital on Career, 3(3), 580–600. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.33.580600
16. Widodo, S. (2012). Penguatan Modal Sosial Untuk Pengembangan Nafkah Berkelanjutan dan Berkeadilan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, (April), 1–10.
17. Wildan, W., Sukardi, S., & Syuaeb, M. Z. (2016). The Feasibility of Development of Social Capital-Based Ecotourism in West Lombok. Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 32(1), 214–222. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/154228/the-feasibility-of-development-of-social-capital-based-ecotourism-in-west-lombok
18. Woolcock, M., & Apr, N. (2007). Social Capital and Economic Development : Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework Social capital and economic development : Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/657866
19. Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, and Policy. World Bank Research Observer, 15, No. 2(August), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225