Main Article Content
investigative reporting, Tempo magazine, Indonesia, case study, Tempo investigative reporting activities
Purpose of the study: Through an investigative news, “Kapal Patroli Pembawa Selisih” (Tempo, 2004, May 16), this research is conducted for the purpose of examining Tempo’s investigative reporting pattern – how Tempo conceptualize its investigative reporting, how Tempo plan its investigative reporting, how Tempo evaluate its investigative reporting and how Tempo conduct its investigative reporting.
Methodology: This study uses qualitative method with case study approach, through interpretive framework. Case study approach designed for this research is a single case (embedded) in nature, which applies multi-level analysis. Analysis is carried out to discover the answers to understand the reporting of investigation, both stated by literature and meanings conceptualized by Tempo Magazine itself. ‘One observation’ is the terminology of investigative reporting (11-steps of investigative reporting by Paul N. Williams).
Main Findings: Investigative reporting by Tempo Magazine is a rigorous and systematic reporting, disclosing wrongdoing based on evidence, facts and data. Investigation’s editorials of Tempo Magazine form special teams. The investigation team gives emphasis to quality and capacity of journalists, which coordinated by an editor. Investigasi rubric is systematically a reporting unit integrated with Tempo’s editorial management.
Applications of this study: Tempo’s investigative activity in Indonesia is not only a matter of press action. Its presence encourages democratic verve in Indonesia. Tempo’s reporting pattern represents social, cultural, politics and other subjects. As a matter of fact, Tempo’s investigative reporting is linked to Indonesia’s Human Rights Affair, in articulating freedom of thought and opinion. Thus, this research is able to be use as material for research in politics, sociology, communication, media and cultural studies.
Novelty/Originality of this study: Investigative reporting is rather a unique topic of research. Most of the research discuss investigation within the news themes and its impact, or journalistic professionalism. Thus, the research on Tempo’s investigative reporting has its novelty.
Aucoin, J. (2007). Journalistic moral engagement: Narrative strategies in American muckracking. Journalism, 8(5):559–572.
Aucoin, J. (2013). Historiographic essay: The investigative tradition in American journalism. American, 14(3-4):317–329.
Berkowitz, D. (2007). Professional views, community news: Investigative reporting in small US dailies. Journalism,8(5):551–558.
Brooks, B. S., Kennedy, G., Moen, D. R., Ranly, D., and The Missouri Group (1988). News Reporting and Writing. New York. St. Martin’s Press.
Burgh, H. D. (2000). Investigative journalism: Context and practice. London. Routledge.
Burgh, H. D. (2003). Kings without Crown? The re-emergence of Investigative Journalism, volume 25.
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. London. Sage Publications.
Ettema, J. and Glasser, T. (1984). On the epistemology of investigative journalism, presented at Annual Meeting of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Grainesville.
Ettema, J. and Glasser, T. (1998). Custodians of conscience: investigative journalism and public virtue. Columbia University Press, New York.
Ettema, J. and Glasser, T. (2007). An international symposium on investigative journalism. Journalism, 8(5):491–494.
Felle, T. (2015). Digital watchdogs? data reporting and the news media’s traditional fourth estate function. Journalism, 17(1):85–96.
Forbes, D. (2005). A simple introduction to principles and practice in investigative reporting. Johannesberg: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Gerli, M., Mazzoni, M., and Mincigrucci, R. (2018). Constraints and limitations of investigative journalism in Hungary, Italy, Latvia and Romania. European Journal of Communication, 33(1):1–15.
Ghoneim, S. (2003). Investigative journalism as a safeguard for democracy. Course: Dissertation, New Media Journalism. London, Faculty.
Gillham, B. (2000). Case Study Research Methods. Continuum, London.
Hadad, T. (1999). Investigasi: Pengalaman Tempo. Jakarta: Lembaga Pers DR Soetomo (LPDS).
Houston, B. (2010). The Future of Investigative Reporting. Daedalus, 139(2):45–56.
Ismail, A. and Ahmad, M. K. (2014). Conceptualization of investigative journalism: The perspectives of Malaysian media practitioners. Procedia -. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155:165–70. Che Su.
Lanosga, G. (2014). New Views of Investigative Reporting in the Twentieth Century. American Journalism, 31(4):490–506.
Larson, A. (2016). Investigative reporting in the networked media environment: Journalists’ use of social media in reporting violent extremism. Journalism Practice, 11(10).
Li, K. and Sparks, C. (2016). Chinese newspapers and investigative reporting in the new media age. Journalism Studies, 19(3):415–431.
Lublinski, J., Spurk, C., Fleury, J. M., Labassi, O., Mbarga, G., Nicolas, M. L., and Rizk, T. A. (2015). Triggering change – How investigative journalists in Sub-Saharan Africa contribute to solving problems in society. Journalism, 17(8):1074–1094.
Nord, L. (2007). Investigative journalism in Sweden: A not so noticeable noble art. Journalism - Theory, Practice &. Criticism, 8(5):517–521.
Parasie, S. (2015). Data-driven revelation? Digital Journalism, 3(3):364–380.
Tong, J. and Sparks, C. (2009). Investigative journalism in China today. Journalism Studies, 10(3):337–352.
Yin, R. K. (1996). Case study research: Design and methods. California. SAGE Publication.
Zdovc, S. and Kovacic, M. (2007). The Paradox of Slovenia. Journalism, 8(5):522–52