ARTICULATION OF WOMEN THROUGH THE LENS OF INTERSECTIONALITY AND ITS DIMENSIONS IN ‘ONE PART WOMAN’ AND ‘SINGAREVVA AND THE PALACE’

Main Article Content

Dr. Rimah Saleh Alyahya

Keywords

Intersectionality, Caste, Class, Community, Gender, Sexuality, Oppressions

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: This paper aims to articulate women through the lens of intersectionality and its dimensions in ‘One Part Woman’ and ‘Singarevva and the Palace’. The research addresses the issues faced by ideologically, culturally, and materially deprived women of the society.


Methodology: In order to achieve the purpose of the study, two novels, namely, ‘One Part Woman’ (by Perumal Murugan) and ‘Singarevva and the Palace’ (by Chandrasekhar Kambar), were critically analyzed.


Results: It is inferred that the two novels helped to understand the nature and variety of community, class, and gender. It is found that there is a difference in the community attitude towards the barrenness of women. In the case of ‘One Part Woman’, the community permits her to go to the chariot festival and choose any stranger to attain motherhood, whereas in the case of ‘Singarevva and the Palace’, the community does not allow her to attain motherhood outside her marriage. It is found that the gender of women is the cause of various oppressions due to which women’s rights are denied. It is inferred that Ponna and Singarevva transcend their marital relationships to attain motherhood. It is seen that female sexuality is meant only for motherhood and for the benefit of the progeny. Thus, women’s sexuality is also oppressed.


Implications: Women face distressful situations, agony, and pain arising out of patriarchal ties, such as caste, class, community, religion, sexuality, and gender. Women play the role of a mother, daughter, wife, sister, friend, etc. She deserves a better position and status in the society. The oppressions faced by women form hurdles in their lives. They are the care takers of the family and they need to be respected and given a good rank in the society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 84 | PDF Downloads 55 XML Downloads 0

References

Anna Carastathis (2014). The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory. Philosophy Compass. 9(5):304-314
Baker, A. (2006). India’s affirmative action war. Retrieved December 10th, 2011, from http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1198102,00.html.
Bell Hooks (2004). Understanding Patriarchy. Published by Simon and Schuster
Collins, P.H. (2000). The politics of Black feminist thought. In P.H. Collins (ed.), Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (1-20). New York and London: Routledge.
Connell, R. W. (1989). Cool guys, swots and wimps: The interplay of masculinity and education. Oxford Review of Education. 15(3):291 - 303.
Crenshaw K (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 140: 139–167.
Crenshaw K (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–1299.
Dumont, L. (1980). Homo hierarchicus: The caste system and its implications. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Gupta, A. (2006). Affirmative action in higher education in India and the US: A study in contrasts. In CSHE, Research and Occasional Paper Series. University of California, Berkeley
Geeta Somjee (1989). Approaches to the Study of Problems of Women. Narrowing the Gender Gap. The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Jaspal Singh et. al (2015). Violence through Religious Rituals: The Critical Analysis of Perumal Murugan’s One Part Woman. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 2(4): 634-636.
Kambara, Chandrashekar (2003). Singarevva and the Palace. India: Penguin Books.
McCall L (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(3): 1771–1800.
Malhotra, M, ed (2004). Empowerment of Women: Women in rural development. New Delhi: Isha Books
Murugan, Perumal (2014). One Part Woman. India: Penguin Books.
Nazir Ali (2016). The Human and the Non-Human in Perumal Murugan’s One Part Woman. Research Journal of English Language and Literature.4(2):661-664
Razvi, M., & et. al (2010). Non-governmental organization and the socio-economic development of low income women in India. Human Resource Development International. 13(1):65-81.
Satyajit Pal. (2017). Representation of Ancient South-Indian Culture: A Study of Perumal Murugan’s One Part Woman. The Literary Herald. 3(1):798-803
Selvarani Paulraj (2017). Single Issue, Multitude Suffering-Trauma and Pain -Reference To Perumal Murugan’s One Part Woman. Pune Research World- An international Journal of interdisciplinary Studies. 2(2):1-12
Singh, S. (2010). Women’s autonomy in rural India: Need for culture and context. International Social Work. 53(2):169-186.
Smiet, K. (2017). Travelling Truths: Sojourner Truth, Intersectionality, and Feminist Scholarship. Radboud University, Nijmegen.
Symington, A. (2004). Intersectionality: A tool for gender and economic justice. Women’s Rights and Economic Change, 9:1-8.
Weber, L. (2001). Understanding race, class, gender and sexuality: A conceptual framework. Boston: McGraw-Hill.