STRENGTHENING PLURALISM IN LITERATURE LEARNING FOR CHARACTER EDUCATION OF SCHOOL STUDENTS

Main Article Content

Ali Imron A.M.
Farida Nugrahani

Keywords

strengthening pluralism, literary materials, character education, school students, socio-cultural society

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the aspects of pluralism in literature as a portrait of socio-cultural society and to describe the aspects of pluralism as a literary material for character education, in particular, the affirmation of student nationalism.


Methodology: This research uses the descriptive qualitative method. Data source are literary works containing pluralism dimensions in poetry, fiction, and drama genres. Data collection through library study techniques and in-depth interviewing and Focus Group Discussion. Data analysis is done by reading the method of the semiotic model including heuristic reading (language level) and hermeneutic reading (interpretation level of meaning).


Results: Result of research and discussion are the aspect of pluralism in literature is a portrait of socio-cultural condition of diversity at society and the aspects of pluralism can be stressing as a literary material for character education, especially the affirmation of nationalism of school students.


Implications: Thus, pluralism literature is a literature that expresses the notions of diversity that reflect the real portrait of the Indonesian nation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 50 | PDF Downloads 35 XML Downloads 0

References

Al-Ma’ruf, A. I. (2007a). Multikulturalisme dalam Novel Burung-Burung Rantau Karya Y.B. Mangunwijaya. Jurnal Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, Januari 2007, 6(1).
Al-Ma’ruf, A. I. (2007b). Pembelajaran Sastra Multikultural di Sekolah: Aplikasi Novel Burung-Burung Rantau. Jurnal Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, Juni 2007, 19(1).
Appadurai, A. (1991). Global Ethnoscape: Notes and Queries for Transnational Anthropology. Recapturing Anthropology Working in the Present.
Chamamah-Soeratno, S. (1990). "Hakikat Penelitian Sastra”. Gatra Nomor 10/11/12. Yogyakarta. IKIP Sanata Dharma. Core Competence and Basic Competence of Senior High School Class XII (2017). Curriculum, 2013.
Dedi, S. (1998). Mengangkat Citra dan Martabat Guru.Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.
Demiralp, N. (2007). Geography Teaching Materials and 2005 Geography Teaching Program. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(1).
Ekstrand, L. H. (1997). Multicultural Education. In Saha, L. J., editor, International Encyclopedia of the Sociology of Education, New York. Pergamon.
Eneste, P. (1991). Novel dan Film. Jakarta. Nusa Indah.
Fasli, J. and Dedi, S. (2001). Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Konteks Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta. Adi Cita Karya Nusa. Hasyim, N. (2001). Pedoman Penyusunan Bahan Penyuluhan Sastra. Jakarrta. Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas.
Hawkes, T. (1978). Structuralism and Semiotics. London. Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Ibrahim, B. (2004). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta. Bumi Aksara.

Ismail, T. (2002). “Setelah Menguap dan Tertidur 45 Tahun”. Makalah dalam Konferensi Nasional Himpunan Sarjana- Kesusastraan Indonesia XIII.
Jenaabadi, H. and Khosropour, A. (2014). An Investigation on The Amount of Employing Total Quality Management Prin- ciples by School Principals and its Correspondence with their Affectivity. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 2(1):13–17.
Kar, T. and Isik, C. (2014). Analysis of Problems Posed by Pre-service Primary Teachers about Adding Fractions in terms of Semantic Structures. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2):135–146.
Kemendiknas (2011). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter. Jakarta. Badan Penelitiandan Pengembangan, Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan.
Kuntjoroningrat (1989). Pengantar Antropologi. Jakarta. Djambatan.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and Language Teaching, Answer Guide Teachers and Trainers. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.
Mendes, I. A. and daSilva, C. A. F. (2018). Problematization and Research as a Method of Teaching Mathematics. IEJME- Mathematics Education.
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills. Sage Publication.
Moglen, H. (October 1984). Erosion in the Humanities. Change, 16(7).
Mulyasa (2005). Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Muyambiri, B. and Chabaefe, N. N. (2018). The Finance – Growth Nexus in Botswana: A Multivariate Causal Linkage.
Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 2(2):03. https://doi.org/10.20897/djfm/2634. Piet, A. S. (1994). Profil Pendidik Profesional. Yogyakarta. Andi Offset.
Raoul, S. K. (2014). Language Development of the Preschool Children: The Effects of an Audio-Visual Intervention Program in Delhi. International Journal of Instruction, January 2014, 7(1).
Ribera, J. P. and Jimenez-Jimenez, J. (2018). Espacios reales y simbólicos de la pedagogía social: la praxis de la redención, entre el control y la emancipación. Opción, 34(86):547–576.
Rusmini, O. (2000). Tarian Bumi. Jakarta. Gramedia.
Saeidi, H. and Prasad, G. B. (2014). Impact of accounting information systems (AIS) on organizational performance: A case study of TATA consultancy services (TCS)-India. UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 4(4):412–417.
Sayuti, S. A. (2002). Sastra dalam Perspektif Pembelajaran: Beberapa Catatan. In dalam Riris K. Toha-Sarumpaet, editor,
, Indonesiatera. Sastra Masuk Sekolah. Magelang.
Toffler, A. (1997). Kejutan Masa Depan (Terj. Sri Koesdiyantinah). Jakarta. PT Pantja Simpati. Tohari, A. (2009). Ronggeng Dukuh Paruk. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Yanpar, T. (2005). Teaching Technologies and Material Development. Ankara. Memorable Publications.