COMPETITION LAW IN ASEAN: THE FUTURE OF COMPETITION AUTHORITY IN ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

Main Article Content

Mukti Fajar ND

Keywords

Competition Law, Competition Authority, ASEAN Economic Community

Abstract

Purpose of Study: ASEAN countries have entered into the free-market era, based on AEC Agreement in 2015. This ASEAN free market system will certainly stimulate business competition among the members. Therefore, ASEAN needs competition law and competition authority to foster healthy competition among businesses in the ASEAN area. This research focuses on; first, that ASEAN members need to develop and harmonize the Competition Law existing in each country; second, ASEAN members need to set up the Competition Authority to enforce the implementation of the free market system.


Methodology: This paper uses normative legal research, and proposes two main arguments. The first, to support a healthy business competition in the ASEAN single market, it is necessary for all ASEAN member states to have Competition law, and the competition law in each ASEAN country can be made by referring to the guidelines formulated at the level of ASEAN. The second, the Competition Authority in ASEAN Economic Community is an independent institution established by each member states authoritative to conduct an investigation, prosecution, and adjudication, as well as to cooperate with the Competition Authority in other member countries.


Results: ASEAN is a very potential market. The transactions between ASEAN countries or from other countries show an extraordinary improvement. With the opening of the ASEAN single market since 2015, the business competition will be tighter and of course, the market is expected to be in good health and not controlled by certain business groups.


Implications/Applications: To support healthy business competition in the ASEAN single market, it is urgent that all countries have Competition law. The regulation is made in each country by referring to the guidelines that have been formulated at the level of ASEAN to create harmonization of law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 78 | PDF Downloads 59 XML Downloads 0

References

Ltd. Defendant I Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd, Defendant II: Singtel, Defendant III: STT Communications Ltd, Defendant IV: Asia Mobile Holdings Company Pte Ltd, Defendant V: Asia Mobile Holdings Pte Ltd, Defendant VI: Indonesia Com- munications Ltd, Defendant VII: Indonesia Communications Pte Ltd, Defendant VIII: Singapore Telecommunications Pte Ltd, Defendant IX Singapore Telecom Pte Ltd.
Netherlands authority for consumer and market, strategy document’, Available at https://www.acm.nl/en/pulication/11993
/strategy-netherlands-authority-for-consumers-and-market/. Accessed on 15 July 2017.
The World Bank, Trends in Developing Economies 1996, 491 (1996) in Sakda Thanitcul, Competition Law in Thailand: A Preliminary Analysis, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Volume 1 Issue 1 Symposium: APEC Com- petition Policy and Economic Development, January 2002, h. 171. // Barbora Valockova EU Centre in Singapore,EU Competition Law: A Roadmap for ASEAN?, Working Paper No. 25, November 2015, http://www.eucentre.sg/wp-content
/uploads/2015/11/WP25-EU-Competition-Law.pdf.
See Price Fixing and Anti-Monoply Act of 1979 (Thai), available at http://www.apeccp.org.tw/doc/Thailand/Competition/t hcom02.html. Dalam Sakda Thsinitcul, Competition Law in Thailand: A Preliminary Analysis h. 171, Washington Univer- sity Global Studies Law Review, Volume 1 Issue 1 Symposium: APEC Competition Policy and Economic Development, Accessed on January 2002.
Barbora Valockova EU Centre in Singapore, EU Competition Law: A Roadmap for ASEAN?, Working Paper No. 25, November 2015, Available at http://www.eucentre.sg/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/WP25-EU-Competition-Law.pdf ac- cessed on Sunday 16 July 2017.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty. Regulation 1/2003 introduced comprehensive changes to the system governing how EU competition law is enforced by competition authorities... see Francesco Rizzuto (2011) , Article 5 of Regulation 1/2003: the limits to national procedural autonomy, European Competition Law Review E.C.L.R. 2011, 32(11), 564-572.
Regulated in Article 4 on the Powers of the Commission; Stated that For the purpose of applying Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, the Commission shall have the powers provided for by this Regulation. Also in Article 5 Powers of the competition authorities of the Member States; stated that The competition authorities of the Member States shall have the power to apply Articles 81 and 82 of theTreaty in individual cases. For this purpose, acting on their own initiative or on a complaint, they may takethe following decisions; (1).requiring that an infringement be brought to an end, (2) ordering interimmeasures, L 1/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 4.1.2003 (3) accepting commitments, (4) imposing fines, periodic penalty payments or any other penalty provided for in their national law.
Where on the basis of the information in their possession the conditions for prohibition are not met they may likewise decide that there are no grounds for action on their part. In Article 6 Powers of the national courts; stated that National courts shall have the power to apply Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty.
Council Regulation (European Union) No. 1/2003.
Op.cit, Annetje Ottow, p.36.
Article 5 of Council Regulation (European Union) No. 1/2003. ASEAN Regional Guidelines.Op.cit.
Barbora Valockova Op cit.
http://www.asean-competition.org/aegc. accessed on Sunday 16 July 2017. Regionalisation as the first step from the globalization.
(2015). ASEAN economic blue print 2025,mJakarta. AEC Blueprint : www.asean.org.
ASEAN economic blue print 2025, mJakarta (2015).
Chalmers, D., Hadjiemmanuil, C., Monti, G., and Tomkins, A. (2006a). European Union Law, Cambridge University Press
: New York . pages 940–954.
Chalmers, D., Hadjiemmanuil, C., Monti, G., and Tomkins, A. (2006b). European Union Law, Cambridge University Press
: New York . pages 941–953.
Chalmers, D., Hadjiemmanuil, C., Monti, G., and Tomkins, A. (2006c). European Union Law, Cambridge University Press
: New York . pages 16–20.
Chandra Setiawan: Jurnal Kompetisi. 14th edition:2013.
dan Yoshifumi Fkukunaga, C. L. (April 2013). ASEAN Regional on Competition Policy. h. 1. Fairhurst, J. (2012b). Law of The European Union, Ninth Edition. P 752 – 756.
Fairhurst, J. ((Parson, Essex England; 2012)a). Law of the European Union, Ninth Edition.
Hojati, M., Rezaei, F., and Iravani, M. R. (2014). Study the Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies to Increase Student Motivation and Probation of Sama Vocational Schools Probation Students of Najaf Abad Branches in School Year 2013-2014, UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies. 2(2):35–40.
Huda, M. K. and Kamarudin, N. N. Harmonizing Competition Law In The Asean Economic Community, International Journal of Business, Economics and Law. Economic Community, International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 9(4). ISSN 2289-1552// Gamze ÖZ, The Role of Competition Authorities and Sectoral Regulators: Regional Experiences, PAPER Submitted to UNCTAD’s Seventh Session of the Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Competition Law and Policy, Geneva, 30 October to 2 November 2006.
Kozhanova, M. B., Svechnikova, N. V., Akhmetzyanova, G. N., Kondrashova, E. N., Maksimova, N. L., and Zakharova,
Z. A. (2016). Psycho-pedagogical conditions of professional culture development of a university professor. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1):15–23.
Lee, C. (2014). Competition Law Enforcement in Malaysia: Some Recent Development, Januari. h. 1.
Lee, C. (April 2013a). ASEAN Regional Coorperation Policy. YoshifuniFukunaga: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
Lee, C. (April 2013b). ASEAN Regional Coorperation Policy. YoshifuniFukunaga: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
Lee, C. (April 2013c). ASEAN Regional Coorperation Policy. YoshifuniFukunaga: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
Lobão, J. and Pereira, C. (2016). Looking for Psychological Barriers in nine European Stock Market Indices. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 1(1):39. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201639.
Lubis, A. F., Usaha, H. P., and dan Konteks, A. T. (2009). The Guidelines on Developing Core Competencies in Competition Policy and Law for ASEAN. Available at http://www.asean-competition.org/file/post_image/Regional%20Core%20Comp etencies.pdf. accessed on Sunday 16 July 2017.
Manso, A. G. and Silva, A. (2018). Investigadoras investigando: Aproximación exploratoria feminidad infantil Maranhão (Brasil). Opción, 34(86):577–611.
Ottow, A. (2014). Market and Competition Authorities, oxford press, p.30.// Barbora Valockova EU Centre in Singapore, EU Competition Law: A Roadmap for ASEAN ?, Working Paper No. 25, November 2015, Available at http://www.eucent re.sg/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/WP25-EU-Competition-Law.pdf accessed on Sunday 16 July 2017.
Rahman, N. A. and Ahamat, H. (2016). competition law in Malaysia, assist, Malaysia. page p.2.
Ranjbaran, A. (2014). Investigation of Factors affecting in customer fundraising with emphasis on role of social marketing mass media in Saderat bank of Iran. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 2(2):31–37.
Rodyk and LLP, D. Competition laws in ASEAN: A South-East Asian perspective. Available at http://www.lexology.com
/library/detail.aspx?g=6c532563-816b-4507-ade6-bfbd13a3f4ab, accessed on Sunday 16 July 2017.

Singham, G. and Hariharan, S. (2012).
Singham, G. and SoumyaHariharan (2012). Competition Law Alert, Rodyk& Davidson LLP Strategy Advice Global Representation Enduring Relation. Only five AMS have generic competition law legislation, namely Malaysia (The
Competition Act 2010 /Malaysian Competition Act), Thailand (The Trade Competition Act 1999 /Thai Competition Act), Vietnam, (The Law of Competition (no 27-2-4-QH11) /Vietnam Competition Act) Indonesia (Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition Practices /Indonesian Competition Act), and Singapore (The Competition Act/Singapore Competition Act).
Usman, R. (2013). hukum persaingan usaha. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika. whish, R. and Bailey, D. (2012). ”Competition Law”,Oxford press. P.49. Whish, R. and Bailey, D. (2012). ”Competition Law”,Oxford press. P. 49.