Main Article Content
spatial organization, urban environment, cinema environment, national identity, artistic culture, urban myth concept
Purpose of the study: The purpose of the present article is to study, generalize and determine the main tendencies in the spatial organization of the urban cinema environment of Kazakhstani cities within post-Soviet cinematographic materials in the context of searching for an identity notion and a general “urban myth” concept.
Methodology: The objects of the study include films of post-restructuring cinema production and the image of a big city depicted in them, different from the stereotype prevailing in Soviet cinema, which was analyzed in the paradigm of creating a cinema environment in Kazakhstani films during the period of independence. For the careful examination of cinematographic artistic means, the study used hermeneutical, functional and comparative methods.
Main findings: The results showed that the article dealt with the environment-forming and image-forming role of cinema in architecture, as well as with the interaction factors of arts in artistic culture and the spatial organization of the urban environment. The development trends of cinema were considered as potential new vectors of the compositional components of the environment.
Applications of this study: The study may be used for presenting a careful review of the current state of the problem of the spatial organization of the urban cinema environment as a search for identity in Kazakhstani post-Soviet cinematography, as well as for further investigations in similar directions. The article might be useful for students of art faculties of colleges and universities, specialists in cinematography and all those interested in the study area.
Novelty/Originality of this study: The study of the urban cinema environment was firstly conducted using the paradigm of the identity search. Multiple methods were used in order to present a deep and thorough analysis of the spatial organization of the city environment in Kazakhstani post-Soviet films. The problem of urban environment creation has been analyzed using the mentioned criteria in synchronic and diachronic dimensions for the first time.
2. Amandykova, D.A., Imanbayeva, Z.A., Assylbekova, A.M., Nurkusheva, L.T. & Ostapenko, I.I. (2018). On the history of studying museum complexes. Astra Salvensis, 11, 311-320.
3. Bennett, M., Teague, D.W. (1999). The Nature of Cities: Ecocriticism and Urban Environments. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
4. Bonnes, M., Mannetti, L., Secchiaroli, G., Tanucci, G. (1990). The city as a multi-place system: An analysis of people urban environment transactions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(1), 37-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80023-4
5. Braester, Yo. (2010). painting the City Red: Chinese Cinema and the Urban Contract. Durham: Duke University Press.. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392750
6. Chu, K. (2012). Constructing ruins: new urban aesthetics in Chinese art and cinema. In M. Munro (Ed.), Modern Art Asia: Selected Papers: Issues 1-8 (pp. 191-212).
7. Clarke, D. (2005). The Cinematic City. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973363
8. Dickey, S. (1993). Cinema and the urban poor in South India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557972
9. Duarte, F., Firmino, R., &Crestani, A. (2015). Urban Phantasmagorias: Cinema and the Immanent Future of Cities. Space and Culture, 18(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331214533257
10. Faulkner, S. (2003). Catalan city cinema. New Cinemas: Journal of Contemporary Film, 1(3), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1386/ncin.1.3.141/0
11. Kabylov, D.B., Moldabekov, M., Koshenov, K., Amandykova, D.A., Ostapenko, I.I., Mugzhanova, G., Gvozdikova, T.A. & Bryantsev, A.A. (2017). Compositional aspects of urban environment organization. Man in India, 97, 281-297.
12. Kozbagarova, N.Z., Onichshenko, Y.V., Shilderhanov, B.K., Amandykova, D.A. & Amangeldievna, A.R. (2018). To the history of the museumification of burial mounds. Astra Salvensis, 6 (12), 141-148. https://astrasalva.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/astra-salvensis-vi-2018-no-123.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019.
13. Pallasmaa, Ju. (2008). Lived Space in Architecture and Cinema. The Architect, 06. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-JZSS200806006.htm. Accessed 14 June 2019.
14. Sabitov, A.R. (2007). Spatial models in the architecture of Kazakhstan. The author’s abstract of doctoral dissertation.
15. Shiel, M. (2008). Cinema and the City in History and Theory. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cinema-and-the-City-in-History-and-Theory-Shiel/d43438073239484af3513ab7fa7d52e95753dc27#paper-header. Accessed 14 June 2019.
16. Shiel, M., & Fitzmaurice, T. (2011). Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Societies in a Global Context. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Shilderkhanov, B.K., N.Z., Popov, Y.G., Myrzahmetova, S.T., Kostsova, A.A., Trofimov, V.P. & Amandykova, D.A. (2018). Compositional features of ethnic interior design. Astra Salvensis, 6, 569-580.
18. Smailova, I. (2013). A debate of the film critic with the film meaner about the style and film language in Kazakh feature films: what I want, what I like, what inspires. Astana (Kazakhstan).
19. The partisan cinema. Manifesto. (2014). Likbez, 25, 158.
20. Yerzhanov, A. (2014). “If I drank, I would shoot comedies”. Vlast. https://vlast.kz. Accessed 25 June 2019.