• Ammu Gopalakrishnan Research Scholar, Department of Transport Planning, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-4818
  • Sewa Ram Professor, Department of Transport Planning, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi.
  • Pradip Kumar Sarkar Professor, Department of Transport Planning, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi.
Keywords: Empirical Model, Pedestrian Level of Service, Pedestrian delay, Vehicular Volume, Cycle time.


Purpose: Level of Service is a widely adopted terminology to determine the efficiency of any transport system. From the literature it was studied that the multiple linear regression models established by many researchers to determine PLoS evolved with addition or removal of one or more physical parameters or with respect to the perception of users from different locations. At an intersection, there is little or no established methodology developed so far to determine a quantitative approach for PLoS similar to Vehicular Level of Service (VLoS). It was also pointed out that under heterogeneous traffic conditions, pedestrians are most vulnerable at intersections and they share the same space with motorized vehicles for crossing movements.

Methodology: Thus, this study was built on the hypothesis that pedestrian delay of a signalized intersection is quantitatively dependent on pedestrian volume, vehicular volume and cycle time. Two signalized intersections operating as fully actuated and fixed cycle time were considered for study for period of four hours each, covering two hours of morning peak and off-peak hour traffic data.

Main Findings: Using various statistical techniques, an empirical model was developed between the pedestrian delay and independent variables namely cycle time, pedestrian volume and vehicular volume. PLoS range was also determined through k-means clustering technique.

Implications: The empirical model developed was validated and the application of this research was also explained.

Novelty: The study is a new quantitative approach to determine PLoS and was limited to two intersections. Increase in the data may improve the accuracy of the model.


1. G. Archana, E. K. Reshma, “Analysis of pedestrian level of service for crosswalk at Intersections for urban condition.” International Journal of Students Research in Technology & Management, Vol 1 (06): 604-609, 2011.
2. Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Jaipur, Jaipur Development Authority, 2010.
3. Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC, 2010
4. Indian Highway Capacity Manual (INDO-HCM). Central Road Research Institute, Report submitted to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 2017.
5. S. U. Jensen, “Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service at Intersections, Roundabouts and other Crossings.” Transportation Research Board, 01474921, 13-0950, 2012.
6. T. Muraleetharan, T. Adachi, T. Hagiwara,S. Kagaya, “Method to determine pedestrian level-of-service for Crosswalks at urban intersections.” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6: 127 – 136, 2005.
7. K. Singh, P. K. Jain, “Methods of Assessing Pedestrian Level of Service.” Journal of Engineering Research and Studies, E-ISSN 0976-7916, Vol.II, Issue I,116-124, 2011
8. X. Wang and Z. Tian, “Pedestrian Delay at Signalized Intersections with a Two-Stage Crossing Design.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2173, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington: 133–138. doi: 10.3141/2173-16, 2010.
9. A. Wilke,J. Ward, S. McLaughlin, “Improving Pedestrian LoS at Traffic Signals." IPENZ Transportation Group Conference Auckland, 2011


10. M. Subotić, V. Radičević, D. Anđelković, Z. Joševski, “Pedestrian walking speed at signalized crossings.” Mechanics Transport Communications article, Academic Journal, ISSN 1312-3823; volume 11, issue 3. 2013.
11. K. K. Pécheux, M. T. Pietrucha, P. P. Jovanis, “User Perception of Level of Service at Signalized Intersections: Methodological Issues.” Transportation Research Circular E-C018: 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity: 322-335
12. J. Y. S. Lee, W. H. K. Lam, M. L. Tam, “Calibration of Pedestrian Simulation Model for Signalized Crosswalk in Hong Kong.” Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5: 1337 – 1351, 2005
13. R. Akcelik, “The Highway Capacity Manual Delay Formula for Signalized Intersections,” ITE Journal: 23-27, 1988.
14. Annual Report, National Transportation Planning and Research Centre, Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment, Thiruvananthapuram, 2010-2011.
15. H. Aravind et al., “A sample approach to clustering in excel,” International Journal of Computer Applications (0975-8887), Volume II – No 7, 2010.
16. Y. Darma, M. R. Karim, J. Mohamad,S. Abdullah, “Control delay variability at signalized intersection based on HCM method.” Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5: 945 – 958, 2005
17. Highway Capacity Manual,Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC., 2000
18. A. Jain,A. Gupta,R. Rastogi, “Pedestrian crossing behaviour analysis at Intersections.” International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 4(1): 103 – 116, 2014.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2014.4(1).08
How to Cite
Gopalakrishnan, A., Ram, S. and Sarkar, P. (2018) “QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO DETERMINE PEDESTRIAN DELAY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION”, International Journal of Students’ Research in Technology & Management, 6(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.18510/ijsrtm.2018.612.
Civil Engineering