Purpose of the study: This study aims to identify Asnaf students’ needs in language learning and their perception of the implementation of the language camp module that had been developed by researchers using the ADDIE model

Methodology: In-depth analysis of focus group interviews with Asnaf students was conducted, and the data obtained were analysed thematically according to several categories

Main Findings and Novelty: The findings of this study revealed that students believed that their anxiety was lowered when they were given the opportunity to cooperate with their friends in a fully immersive and fun English language learning context

Applications of this study: The modules and the findings of this study could be used by any English language educators to conduct English language camps especially to Asnaf children who stay in charity homes.


  1. Ahmar, F., & Anwar, E. (2013). Socio economic status and its relation to academic achievement of higher secondary school students. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science,13(16),13-20.
  2. Azman, A. S., Mat Nor, F., Mawar, M. Y., (2016). Realiti kemiskinan bandar di kalangan asnaf selangor: satu kajian empirical. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Economics & Banking, 2, 155-161
  3. Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2014). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 118-136.
  4. Battle, J., & Lewis, M. (2002). The increasing significance of class: the relative effects of race and socioeconomic status on academic achievement. Journal of Poverty, 21-35
  5. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
  6. Combs, K. L., Gibson, S. K., Hays, J. M., Saly, J., & Wendt, J. T. (2008). Enhancing curriculum and delivery: Linking assessment to learning objectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 87-102.
  7. Cornell, R., Dean, J., & Tomaš, Z. (2016). Up Close and Personal: A Case Study of Three University-Level Second Language Learners’ Vocabulary Learning Experiences. TESOL Journal, 7(4): 823-846.
  8. Ekanjume-Ilongo, B. (2015). The teaching of English as a second language: The case of the National University of Lesotho (NUL). Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1157-1164.
  9. Emotin-Bucjan, M. D. (2011). Development and validation of modules in English 2: Writing in the discipline. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 65-76.
  10. Gayton, A., (2010). Socioeconomic Status and Language Learning Motivation: To What Extent does theFormer Influence the Latter? Scottish Languages Review, 22, 17-28.
  11. Hamilton, R. (2010). YouTube for two: online video in a student-centered, task based ESL/EFL environment. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(8), 27.
  12. Ismail, N. S., & Tahir, I. M. (2011). English Camp Activities: A strategy to enhance students' English proficiency. Studies in Literature and Language, 2(3), 61.
  13. Juriza, I., Ruzanna, Z., Hs, H., Rohaizak, M., Zulkifli, Z., Ma, F., & Nabishah, M. (2011). Outdoor camps experiential learning activities for teamwork and leadership among medical students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 622-625.
  14. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York.
  15. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London.
  16. Lacorte, M. (2013). Sociopolitical and institutional conditions for teaching Spanish as L2 in US universities. Spanish in Context, 10(3), 331–349
  17. Letchumanan, K., Tan, B. H., Paramasivam, S., Sabariah, M. R., & Muthusamy, P. (2015). Incidental Learning of Vocabulary through Computer-Based and Paper Based Games by Secondary School ESL Learners. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23(3).
  18. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage.
  19. Maarof, N., & Tan, S. L. (2013). The Effect of Type of Cooperative Learning Grouping on ESL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Performance. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 21(4).
  20. Mannan Khan, A., & Siddiqui, M. (2014). Use of information technology and services by medical students:a case study. Library Hi Tech News, 31(8), 19-21.
  21. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning: Second Edition. New York.
  22. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education”. Jossey Bass.
  23. Mohamad, M., Omar, A., Hussin, S., & Amir, Z. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of elearning in language classrooms. Humanities, 3,4.
  24. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance improvement, 42(5), 34-37.
  25. Morat, B. N., Shaari, A., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2016). Facilitating ESL learning using youtube: learners’ motivational experiences. The Journal of International Journal of Education, Islamic Studies and Social Sciences Research (IJEISR), 1, 1-9
  26. Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). Effect of peer review and tutor conferencing on English as a second language learners’ writing performance. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (JSSH), 19(1), 25-38.
  27. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
  28. Pufahl, I., & Rhodes, N.C. (2011). Foreign language instruction in U.S. Schools: Results of a national survey of elementary and secondary schools. Foreign Language Annals, 44(2), 258–288
  29. Rugasken, K., & Harris, J. A. (2009). English Camp: A Language Immersion Program in Thailand. Learning assistance review, 14(2), 43-51.
  30. Salehi, H., & Salehi, Z. (2012). Integration of ICT in language teaching: Challenges and barriers. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning (IC4E, 2012), 27, 215-219.
  31. Salve-Opina, A. (2014). The development and validation of online learning modules for college English. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(2), 89-97.
  32. Sarma, S. K. (2015). Qualitative research: Examining the misconceptions. South Asian Journal of Management, 22(3), 176.
  33. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta analytic review of research. Review of educational research, 75(3), 417-453.
  34. Spahiu, I. (2013). Using native language in ESL classroom. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 1(2), 243.
  35. Thang, S. M., Gobel, P., Nor, N. F. M., & Suppiah, V. L. (2011). Students’ attributions for success and failure in the learning of English as a second language: A comparison of undergraduates from six public universities in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 19(2), 459-474.
  36. Vercellotti, M. L. (2017). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education,
  37. Yunus, M. M., Sallehi, H. & Chenzi, C. (2012). Integrating social networking tools into ESL writing classroom: strengths and weaknesses. Canadian center of Science and Education, 5(8), 42-47.
  38. Zakaria, N. Y. K. & Mohamad, M. (2017). Needs analysis of Asnaf students for language camp module (LANCAM). International Conference on Global Education V, 2915 - 2927.
  39. Zakaria, N. Y. K., Yunus, M. (2017). Animoto: perception and attitude of secondary school students` in enhancing speaking skills. Seminar Pendidikan Transdisiplin (STEd 2017), 184-193.
  40. Zarei, N., & Supyan, H. (2016). A Case Study of Blog Based Language Learning: An investigation into ESL learners' interaction. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(1).