Authors retain the copyright without restrictions for their published content in this journal. HSSR is a SHERPA ROMEO Green Journal.
EXPLORATION OF E-LEARNING VS TRADITIONAL LEARNING IN INDIA
Corresponding Author(s) : Rajeev Gupta
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews,
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): March
Purpose of Study: The purpose of the study is to carry out the comparison of traditional learning and e-learning with reference to university education.
Methodology: A comparative analysis method that has been selected to fulfill the purpose of the study. The research data has been collected by various sources internet, previous research studies published in the Journal, universities which offer different technical and nontechnical programs .and further analyzed by in-depth understanding approach.
Result: The outcome of this study will show the effect of e-learning in the current era. As we have compared e-learning with traditional learning and the result shows us that e-learning has filled the gap between the universities and the real-life industries' demands.
Main finding: The result of this study showed that e-learning is the need of the present era in order to fulfill the gap between the universities and the real-life industries' demands. Additionally, e-learning based courses will have more impact and provide more skill and exposure to students as compared to traditional learning mode.
Implications/Applications: This article can help the different universities and students to introduce more e-learning courses in their curriculum and they can fill the real-time industries' demands.
Novelty/originality of the study: Our research can ensure that e-learning has a huge impact on our students and can help to increase the skills and exposure of them according to the current demands.
- Alias, N. Z., Zakariah, N. Z., Ismail, & Aziz, M. N. A. (2012). E-learning Successful Elements for Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 484–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.353
- Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25 (3), 351–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
- Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P.(2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58 (2), 843–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
- Chiu, C. M., C. S. Chiu, and H. C. Chang. (2007). Examining the Integrated Influence of Fairness and Quality on Learners’ Satisfaction and Web-based Learning Continuance Intention. Information Systems Journal 17 (3): 271–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00238.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00238.x
- Chiu, C. M., M. H. Hsu, S. Y. Sun, T. C. Lin, and P. C. Sun. (2005). Usability, Quality, Value and E-learning Continuance Decisions. Computers & Education 45 (4): 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001
- Demirkan, H., M. Goul, and M. Gros. (2010). A Reference Model for Sustainable E-learning Service Systems: Experiences with the Joint University/Teradata Consortium. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8 (1): 151–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00250.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00250.x
- Dongsong Zhang, J. Leon Zhao, Lina Zhou, and Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr., (2004). Can E-Learning Replace Classroom Learning. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 47, No. 5, pg 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986216
- Govindasamy, T. (2001). Successful Implementation of E-learning: Pedagogical Considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4 (3): 287–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9
- Holsapple, C. W., and A. Lee-Post. (2006). Defining, Assessing, and Promoting E-learning Success: An Information Systems Perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4 (1): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00102.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00102.x
- Joe Pulichino, (2005). Current Trends in e-Learning - Research Report.
- Kawatra, P. S., & Singh, N. K. (2006). E-learning in LIS education in India. In C. Khoo, D. Singh & A.S. Chaudhry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice 2006 (A-LIEP 2006), Singapore, 3-6 April 2006 (pp. 605-611). Singapore: School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University.
- Kumar G., Singh G., Bhatanagar V., & Jyoti K. (2019). SCARY DARK SIDE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A PERILOUS CONTRIVANCE TO MANKIND. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 1097-1103. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.75146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.75146
- Lieblein, E. (2000). Critical Factors for Successful Delivery of Online Programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 3 (3), 161–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00036-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00036-7
- Limayem, M., and C. M. Cheung. (2008). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: The Case of Internet-based Learning Technologies. Information & Management, 45(4), 227–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.005
- Loh, C., D. H. Wong, A. Quazi, and R. P. Kingshott. (2016). Re-examining Students’ Perception of E-learning: An Australian Perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 30 (1), 129–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0114
- McGill, T. J., J. E. Klobas, and S. Renzi. (2014). Critical Success Factors for the Continuation of E-learning Initiatives. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.001
- Sela, E., and Y. Sivan. (2009). Enterprise E-learning Success Factors: An Analysis of Practitioners’ Perspective (with a Downturn Addendum). Interdisciplinary Journal of E-learning and Learning Objects, 5 (1), 335–43. https://doi.org/10.28945/81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/81
- Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical Success Factors for E-learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models. Computers & Education, 49 (2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
- Shaikh Farhat Fatma, (2013). E-Learning Trends Issues and Challenges, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Research (IJECR), Vol. 3, Issue 2, 1-10.
- Soong, M. B., H. C. Chan, B. C. Chua, and K. F. Loh. (2001). Critical Success Factors for On-line Course Resources. Computers & Education, 36 (2), 101–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00044-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00044-0
- Sun, Y., and A. Jeyaraj. (2013). Information Technology Adoption and Continuance: A Longitudinal Study of Individuals’ Behavioral Intentions. Information & Management, 50(7), 457–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.005
- Swan, K., P. Shea, E. E. Fredericksen, A. M. Pickett, and W. E. Pelz. (2000). Course Design Factors Influencing the Success of Online Learning. Paper presented at the WebNet 2000 World Conference on the WWW and Internet, San Antonio, TX.
- Volery, T., and D. Lord. (2000). Critical Success Factors in Online Education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14 (5), 216–23. ttps://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731
- Weng, C., C. C. Tsai, and A. Weng. (2015). Social Support as a Neglected E-learning Motivator Affecting Trainee’s Decisions of Continuous Intentions of Usage. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31 (2), 177–92. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1311