Main Article Content


Purpose: This article examines affective technology to understand the significance of creative labour in Indonesia multinational oil and gas companies in the city of Balikpapan, East Kalimantan.

Methodology: The data is gathered from desk studies by reviewing policies, monographs, and printed documents, and ethnographic observations to understand the social and cultural context.

Main findings: We identified two types of affective technologies created by creative labours: the visual simulation to create new subjects and visual efforts to forge corporate reputation. They are important in helping in the production of subjects and the value of corporate branding.

Practical Implications: This study shows the need for extractive industries to pay more detail in providing safety instructions for their employees. Creative workers can be the right agents to compose effective messages with their ability to touch the affective side of employees through the works they produce.

Social Implications: The creative workers are increasing in number; however, their nature of work which is mainly based on gigs is somewhat vulnerable in developing countries like Indonesia. Closer cooperation with the big industries will be favorable for them with the hope that in return they will come up with some products to strengthen the companies' social responsibility.

The novelty of study: While previous studies have rarely underlined the interplay between creative work and extractive industries, this article provides insight into affective technology within the context of extractive industries.


Affective Technology Creative Work Culture Kalimantan Labour

Article Details

How to Cite
Wibisono, H., & Purwanto, S. (2020). AFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND CREATIVE LABOUR IN INDONESIA’S EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY. Management, Innovation & Entrepreneurial Research, 6(2), 55-63.


  1. Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social text, 22(2), 117-139.
  2. Arvidsson, A. (2006). Brands: Meaning and value in media culture. London and New York. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
  3. Avis, J. (2013). Post-Fordist Illusions: knowledge-based economies and transformation. Power and Education 5(1): 16–27.
  4. Baker, S. and Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). Creative labour: Media work in three cultural industries. London and New York. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
  5. Benson, P. (2008). El campo: faciality and structural violence in farm labor camps. Cultural Anthropology 23(4): 589–629.
  6. Bill, A.E. (2009). Creative Girls: Fashion design education and governmentality. (Unpublish PhD Thesis), Research Space, Auckland, NZ.
  7. Buckermann, W.A. (2012). Corporate Culture and Management Style of a French Multinational Petroleum Company: an Empirical Analysis on the Influence of Cultural Standards and Dimensions. Esslingen, Germany. Hochschule Esslingen.
  8. Bulut, E. (2015). Glamor above, precarity below: Immaterial labor in the video game industry. Critical Studies in Media Communication 32(3): 193–207.
  9. Carey, C. (2015). The careers of fine artists and the embedded creative. Journal of Education and Work 28(4): 407–421.
  10. Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce (No. 20). Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
  11. Charles, L. (2000). The creative city: a toolkit for urban innovators. London: Earthscan.
  12. Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews 7(2): 91–109.
  13. Cunningham, S. and Higgs, P. (2009). Measuring creative employment: Implications for innovation policy. Innovation 11(2): 190–200.
  14. De Castro, G.M., López, J.E.N. and Sáez, P.L. (2006). Business and social reputation: Exploring the concept and main dimensions of corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 63(4): 361–370.
  15. De Peuter, G. (2011). Creative economy and labor precarity: A contested convergence. Journal of Communication Inquiry 35(4): 417–425.
  16. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class (Vol. 9). New York: Basic Books.
  17. Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Garnham, N. (2005). From cultural to creative industries: An analysis of the implications of the “creative industries” approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11(1): 15–29.
  19. Gill, R. and Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society 25(7–8): 1–30.
  20. Grandey, A.A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5(1): 95.
  21. Gu, X. (2014). Cultural industries and creative clusters in Shanghai. City, Culture and Society 5(3): 123–130.
  22. Hardt, M. (1999) Affective labor. Boundary 2, 26(2): 89–100.
  23. Hearn et al. (2014). Creative work beyond the creative industries: Innovation, employment and education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
  24. Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press
  25. Huws, U. (2010). Expression and expropriation: The dialectics of autonomy and control in creative labour. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization 10(3/4): 504–521
  26. Kemp, D., Owen, J.R. and van de Graaff, S. (2012). Corporate social responsibility, mining and “audit culture.” Journal of Cleaner Production 24: 1–10.
  27. Lange, B. (2011). Professionalization in space: Social-spatial strategies of culturepreneurs in Berlin. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 23(3-4): 259–279.
  28. Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society 19(1): 1–31.
  29. Neilson, B. and Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society 25(7-8): 51–72.
  30. Ong, A. and Collier, S. (2005). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Australia: Blackwell Publishing
  31. Pereira, A.J. (2019). Affective Governmentality: Neoliberal Education Advertisements in Singapore (Vol. 9). Singapore: Springer.
  32. Pitts, F.H. (2015). Creativity and the Commodity in the Automobile Industry. International Journal of Cultural and Creative Industries 2(2): 32–41.
  33. Prince, R. (2010). Globalizing the creative industries concept: travelling policy and transnational policy communities. The journal of arts management, law, and society, 40(2), 119-139.
  34. Rajak, D. (2009). “I Am the Conscience of the Company”: Responsibility and the Gift in a Transnational Mining Corporation. Economics and Morality: Anthropological Approaches, pp.211-229.
  35. Renouard, C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, utilitarianism, and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics 98(1): 85–97.
  36. Richard, A. and Rudnyckyj, D. (2009). Economies of affect. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15(1): 57–77.
  37. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the Soul. The Shaping of the Private Self. London: The Free Association.
  39. Rowe, J.K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as business strategy. In Globalization, governmentality and global politics. London and New York: Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 140–178.
  40. Rudnyckyj, D. (2011). Circulating tears and managing hearts: Governing through affect in an Indonesian steel factory. Anthropological Theory 11(1): 63–87.
  41. Ruggie, J.G. (2002). The theory and practice of learning networks: Corporate social responsibility and the global compact. Journal of Corporate Citizenship (5): 27–36.
  42. Schoenberger, E. (2000). Creating the corporate world: strategy and culture, time and space. A Companion to Economic Geography 377.
  43. Scott, A.J. (2014). Beyond the creative city: cognitive–cultural capitalism and the new urbanism. Regional Studies 48(4): 565–578.
  44. Shever, E. (2010). Engendering the company: Corporate personhood and the “face” of an oil company in metropolitan Buenos Aires. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 33(1): 26–46.
  45. Strathern, M. (2000). New accountabilities: anthropological studies in audit, ethics and the academy. Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy 27: 1–18.
  46. Total’s Code of Conduct (2018). Our Values in Practice.
  47. Total’s Golden Rules (2017) Safety at Work.
  48. Welker, M. (2014). Enacting the corporation: an American mining firm in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Univ of California Press.