Main Article Content
Governing institutions, Project management, Resource Limitations and Restrictions, Project Culture, Involvement into Project Activities, Implementation Approaches of project management
Purpose: The article views applied aspects of an important scientific problem - efficiency improvement of state management based on project management that allows solving complex tasks under the conditions of severe restrictions in time, financial and other resources.
Methodology: Methodical approach to project management includes process and targeted approaches that provide current operating activity long with innovative solutions implementation.
Result: The article proves the implementation approach of project management in governing institutions based on the corporate culture, motivation and employee competencies transformation.
Applications: This research can be used for universities, teachers, and students.
Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of Project Management Implementation In Governing Institutions of Russia: Aims and Results are presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.
2. Guidelines for the implementation of project management in the Executive authorities. Appendix to the order of the Ministry of economic development of Russia of April 14, 2014:26Р-АУ (In Russian)
3. Federal Service of State Statistics, 2018. The state. Public organizations
4. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/state/# (In Russian)
5. Lomovceva, O. A., & Kuzmina, L. P. (2017). Creation of project offices in Russian regions: opportunities and limitations. Local self-government in Russia: problems, challenges, solutions, 44-49 (In Russian).
6. Lomovceva, O. A., Kuzmina, L. P., & Golodova, A. A. (2018). Project offices as a factor in the implementation of the strategy of the municipality and the development of the industrial city. News of Volgograd state technical University, 1, 79-85 (In Russian).
7. Official website of the analytical center under the Government of the Russian Federation. – Mode of access: http://ac.gov.ru/ (In Russian)
8. Official website of the Annual international scientific and practical conference of Russia in the field of Economics. Gaidar forum-2018, 2018. Access mode:http://gaidarforum.ru/ (In Russian)
9. Schultz, D. E., & Peltier, J. (2013). Social media's slippery slope: Challenges, opportunities and future research directions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(2), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2012-0054
10. Schweidel, D. A., & Moe, W. W. (2014). Listening in on socialmedia: A joint model of sentiment and venue format choice. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0424
11. Thompson, C. J., Coskuner-Balli, G., 2007. Countervailing market responses to corporate co-optation and the ideological recruitment of consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2): 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1086/519143
12. Cleland, D. I., & Ireland, L. R. (2002). Project management: strategic design and implementation (Vol. 4). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Gray, R. M., Cook, M. B., Natera, M. T., Inglis, M. M., & Dodge, M. L. (2008). Project Management: The. In Managerial Process”, McGraw-Hill.
14. Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (1996). Project risk management: processes, techniques and insights. John Wiley.
15. Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International journal of project management, 21(2), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1
16. Meredith, J. R., Mantel Jr, S. J., & Shafer, S. M. (2017). Project management: a managerial approach. John Wiley & Sons.
17. Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.
18. Frye, T. (2000). Brokers and bureaucrats: Building market institutions in Russia. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10736
19. Frye, T. (1997). Governing the Russian equities market. Post-Soviet Affairs, 13(4), 366-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.1997.10641443
20. Orlovsky, D. T. (1976). Recent studies on the Russian bureaucracy. The Russian Review, 35(4), 448-467. https://doi.org/10.2307/128440
21. Lankina, T. (2006). Governing the locals: local self-government and ethnic mobilization in Russia. Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Lane, D. (2000). What kind of capitalism for Russia?: A comparative analysis. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 33(4), 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(00)00018-0
23. Stoner-Weiss, K. (2002). Central governing incapacity and the weakness of political parties: Russian democracy in disarray. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 32(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004939
24. Johnson, J. E. (1994). The Russian banking system: institutional responses to the market transition. Europe-Asia Studies, 46(6), 971-995. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139408412212
25. Sharafutdinova, G., & Kisunko, G. (2014). Governors and governing institutions: a comparative study of state-business relations in Russia's regions. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7038
26. Gel'man, V., & Lankina, T. (2008). Authoritarian versus democratic diffusions: explaining institutional choices in Russia's local government. Post-Soviet Affairs, 24(1), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.24.1.40
27. Moraski, B. J., & Reisinger, W. M. (2003). Explaining electoral competition across Russia's regions. Slavic Review, 62(2), 278-301. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185578
28. McMann, K. M., & Petrov, N. V. (2000). A survey of democracy in Russia's regions. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 41(3), 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10889388.2000.10641137
29. Stoner-Weiss, K. (2002). Central governing incapacity and the weakness of political parties: Russian democracy in disarray. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 32(2), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004939
30. Gorenburg, D. (1999). Regional separatism in Russia: ethnic mobilisation or power grab?. Europe-Asia Studies, 51(2), 245-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139999029