THE PREVAILING MECHANISMS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PROTECTION AT PERSONS WITH DIFFERENT DOMINANCE OF TEMPERAMENT

Main Article Content

Valentina V. Grebneva
Alexey Ju. Kovtunenko
Victoria B. Tarabaeva
Svetlana V. Moskalenko

Keywords

Temperament, Psychological Defense Mechanisms, Reactive Formations, Negation, Substitution, Regression, Compensation

Abstract

Purpose: The article presents the results of the study of the relationship between the type of temperament and the mechanisms of psychological protection used by a person.


Methodology: The study was conducted on the basis of the Belgorod State National Research University. The study involved students aged 18-20 years old in the amount of 300 people. The groups were formed taking into account the dominance of the type of temperament. Gr. #1 included respondents with a predominance of sanguine temperament; gr. #2 - phlegmatic; gr. #3 - choleric and gr. #4 - melancholic type.


Result: It is shown that there are differences in the severity of the mechanisms of psychological protection in individuals with different dominant temperament. It is revealed that emotionally stable persons with high indicators of strength and balance of nervous processes (sanguine and phlegmatic types) use more complex and ontogenetically later mechanisms of psychological protection.


Applications: This research can be used for universities, teachers, and students.


Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of --- is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 17 | PDF Downloads 14 XML Downloads 1 ePUB Downloads 2

References

bdoli Dehnavi, Z., Ghorbani, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2016). Comparison of temperament and character traits in patients with coronary heart disease and normal population. Research Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(6), 587-592.
2. Abitov, I.R., Gorodetskaya, I.M.,2016. Self-regulation and experience of loneliness of elderly people who live in social care residences. - International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11 (6): 1021-1029.
3. Degteva, G.N., Korneeva, Ya.A., Simonova, N.N.,2017. Personal resources of oil and gas workers for the purposes of adaptation to the negative arctic climate and geographical conditions. - Human Ecology, 9: 15-21. https://doi.org/10.33396/1728-0869-2017-9-15-21
4. Di Giuseppe, M., Ciacchini, R., Piarulli, A., Nepa, G., & Conversano, C. (2019). Mindfulness dispositions and defense style as positive responses to psychological distress in oncology professionals. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 40, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2019.04.003
5. Even-tzur, E., Hadar, U., 2019. Socially accepted violence by “agents of law”: Sublimation of aggression as a model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47: 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.01.005
6. Grebneva, V. V. (2000). Psychology for curators. Belgorod, 2006, P. 112 (In Russian).
7. Grebneva, V. V. (2006). Monitoring individual-psychological features of students of higher education as a group health subject. - Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin. Humanities. Philology. Journalism. Pedagogy Psychology, 14(263), 180–189 (In Russian).
8. Grebneva, V.V., 2017. Monitoring individual-psychological features of students of higher education as a group health subject. - Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin. Humanities. Philology. Journalism. Pedagogy Psychology, 14 (263): 180 – 189. (In Russian).
9. Hankin, B.L., Davis, E.P., Snyder, H., Young, J.F., Glynn, L.M., Sandman, C.A.,2017. Temperament factors and dimensional, latent bifactor models of child psychopathology: Transdiagnostic and specific associations in two youth samples. Psychiatry Research, 252 (1): 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.061
10. Rubinstein, S. L. (2000). Fundamentals of General psychology - St. Petersburg: Publishing house. "Piter", 614-615 (In Russian).
11. Rubinstein, S.L. Fundamentals of General psychology - St. Petersburg: Publishing house. "Piter", 2000: 614-615. (In Russian).
12. Wang, F. L., Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., & Spinrad,T. L. (2016). Role of temperament in early adolescent pure and co-occurring internalizing and externalizing problems using a bifactor model: Moderation by parenting and gender. Development and Psychopathology, 28, 4(1), 1487-1504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579415001224
13. Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280802613866
14. Liaudet, L., Soriano, F. G., Szabó, É., Virág, L., Mabley, J. G., Salzman, A. L., & Szabo, C. (2000). Protection against hemorrhagic shock in mice genetically deficient in poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 97(18), 10203-10208. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170226797
15. Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. (2003). Meat is good to taboo: Dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703321598563
16. Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The journal of psychology, 91(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
17. Cohen, S., Kaplan, J. R., & Manuck, S. B. (1994). Social support and coronary heart disease underlying psychological and biological mechanisms. In Social support and cardiovascular disease (pp. 195-221). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2572-5_9
18. Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. (2003). Meat is good to taboo: Dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703321598563
19. Xiang-yang, D. U. (2011). River and Lake Culture and Cultural Identity: The Cultural Psychological Mechanism of the Prevailing Hidden Rules. Journal of Xuzhou Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 5.

Most read articles by the same author(s)