REVISITING THE LEGAL NATURE AND CONTENT OF A MARRIAGE CONTRACT IN THE MODERN LAW OF THE PRC

Main Article Content

Naixin Naixin

Keywords

PRC’s Law “On Marriage”, marriage contract, content, non-property relationship

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This paper deals with problematic issues related to the legal nature of a marriage contract. It also determines the contents of a marriage contract, which is regulated mainly by Article 19 of the PRC Law "On Marriage" of 2001 and the basic principles of civil law inherent in contract law in general.


Methodology: A common example is the cases when spouses agreed to transfer immovable property from one spouse to another after marriage, but in practice, the spouses did not register changes on the status of the immovable property. In the event of a divorce, one of the spouses requires to recognize the ownership of the real estate and register the changes, while the other spouse disputes that point.


Results: In recent years, marriage contracts have become increasingly popular in China, but special regulations on them in China's Marriage and Family Law are still unavailable. There are a lot of disputes and issues in practice relating to the definition of a marriage contract. In this regard, the question of the legal nature and content of a marriage contract is the subject of debatable research in Chinese legal doctrine.


Applications of this study: This research can be used for the universities, teachers, and students.


Novelty/Originality of this study: In this research, the model of Revisiting the legal nature and content of a marriage contract in the modern law of the PRC is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 34 | PDF Downloads 29 XML Downloads 1 ePUB Downloads 5

References

1. Antúnez, J. V. V. (2016). De nuevo al debate sobre la cuestión de los paradigmas científicos. Opción, 32(81), 7-10.
2. Barlow, A., Duncan, S., James, G., & Park, A. (2005). Cohabitation, marriage and the law: Social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Bloomsbury Publishing.
3. Cretney, S.M. and Masson, J.M. (1925). Principles of Family Law, Cambridge at the University Press.
4. Fuhua, C. (2013). Disputed Issues on Determining the Rights and Obligations of the Spouses' Property. People’s Court Publishing, 22-31.
5. Haghshenas, S., Iravani, M. R., & Nasrabadi, H. A. B. (2015). Study Of Effective Factors On Job Satisfaction Of Omid Hospital Staff In Isfahan City. UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies, 3(1), 15-17.
6. He, C. (2016). Contractual regulation of property relations in the family. Beijing. Peking University Press, 113-116.
7. Krause, H.D. (1999). Family Law, Beijing, Law Press • China
8. Kenan, K. X. (2018). Seeing and the Ability to See: A Framework for Viewing Geometric Cube Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 57-60. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2695
9. Luo, C., Li, M., Peng, P., & Fan, S. (2018). How Does Internet Finance Influence the Interest Rate? Evidence from Chinese Financial Markets. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 2(1), 01. https://doi.org/10.20897/djfm/89590
10. Wang, W. (2017). Actual Issues on the Development of a Marriage Contract: Theory and Practice. China University of Politics and Law Publishing House.
11. Wang J. (2013). Problems arising in insurance contracts // Beijing, Chinese University of Politics and Law.
12. Wardle, L.D. (2007). Seeking Balance and Priorities in Family Law and in Family Life, New York: William S. Hein and Co. Inc Buffalo, In Family Law: Balancing Interests and Pursuing Priorities.
13. Xiaomei, T. (2015). Legal Aspects of a Marriage Agreement, Beijing. Chinese University of Politics and Law, 122-126.
14. Khadduri, M. (1977). Marriage in Islamic law: The modernist viewpoints. Am. J. Comp. L., 26, 213. https://doi.org/10.2307/839669
15. Zhang, S. (2017). On the issue of the legal nature of a marriage contract in the modern family law of the PRC. Beijing, Chinese University of Politics and Law, p. 21-23.
16. Graveson, R. H. (1940). The movement from status to contract. Mod. L. Rev., 4, 261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1940.tb00778.x
17. Andrews, J. A. (1959). The common law marriage. The Modern Law Review, 22(4), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00546.x
18. Dnes, A. W., & Rowthorn, R. (Eds.). (2002). The law and economics of marriage and divorce (Vol. 30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495328
19. Epstein, L. M. (2004). The Jewish marriage contract: a study in the status of the woman in Jewish law. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd..
20. Erickson, A. L. (1990). Common law versus common practice: the use of marriage settlements in early modern England. Economic History Review, 21-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2596511
21. El-Alami, D. (1992). The marriage contract in Islamic law in the Shari'ah and personal status laws of Egypt and Morocco. Brill.
22. Barbalet, J. (2016). Chinese individualization, revisited. Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783315587413
23. Ghodoosi, F. (2015). The Concept of Public Policy in Law: Revisiting the Role of the Public Policy Doctrine in the Enforcement of Private Legal Arrangements. Neb. L. Rev., 94, 685.
24. Griswold, E. N. (1937). Renvoi Revisited. Harv. L. Rev., 51, 1165. https://doi.org/10.2307/1334103
25. Zelin, M. (2009). The firm in early modern China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(3), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.03.002
26. Shepsle, K. A. (2006). Old questions and new answers about institutions: the Riker objection revisited. In The Oxford handbook of political economy.