CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL ASPECT OF THE LEGAL EXPERIMENT OF MIGRATION REGULATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND GERMANY

Main Article Content

Marina V. Markhgeym
Alevtina E. Novikova
Evgeniy E. Tonkov
Vladimir I. Yevtushenko
Goar G. Zagaynova

Keywords

Migrants, Legal Experiment, Constitutional Law, The Basis of The Constitutional System, Constitutional And Legal Experiment

Abstract

Purpose: The article is devoted to the study of the features of the migration policy implemented in the Russian Federation as a kind of legal experiment.


Methodology: The methodological basis of the study was a set of the following methods of scientific knowledge – General scientific methods (analysis and synthesis), private scientific methods (formal legal and comparative legal).


Result: The author analyzes normative acts, including by-laws of both the Russian Federation and its constituent territories. The analysis of the existing regulatory normative approaches to the regulation of migration in Germany is also given. At the same time, the author offers his vision of the possible implementation of German law in the Russian Federation.


Applications: This research can be used for universities, teachers, and students.


Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of Constitutional and Legal Aspect of the Legal Experiment of Migration Regulation in the Russian Federation and Germany is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 33 | PDF Downloads 33 XML Downloads 2 ePUB Downloads 5

References

1. Aufenthaltsverordnung vom 25. November 2004 (BGBl. I S. 2945).
2. Ekeli, K. (2009). Constitutional experiments: representing future generations through submajority rules. Journal of political philosophy, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00328.x
3. Federal'nyj zakon ot 18.07.2006 № 109-FZ «O migracionnom uchete inostrannyh grazhdan i lic bez grazhdanstva v Rossijskoj Federacii». SZ RF. 2006. № 30. St. 3285. (in Russian)
4. Federal'nyj zakon ot 25.07.2002 № 115-FZ «O pravovom polozhenii inostrannyh grazhdan v Rossijskoj Federacii». SZ RF. 2002. № 30. St. 3032. (in Russian)
5. Konstituciya Rossijskoj Federacii. Prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 g. (s uchyotom popravok ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ). SZ RF. 2014. № 31. St. 4398. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.1365/s11621-014-0377-4
6. Levy, R. (2010). Breaking the constitutional deadlock: Lessons from deliberative experiments in constitutional change. Melb. UL Rev., 34: 805.
7. Nakhleh, E. A. (2015). 10 Political Participation and the Constitutional Experiments in the Arab Gulf: Bahrain and Qatar. Social and Economic Development in the Arab Gulf (RLE Economy of Middle East).
8. Nikitinskij, V. I., & Samoshchenko I. S. (1988). Pravovoj ehksperiment i sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva. M.: YUridicheskaya literature (In Russian).
9. Osnovnoj Zakon Federativnoj Respubliki Germanii. Available at: www.humanites.edu.ru (accessed 19 March 2019).
10. Qianfan, Z. (2007). Constitutional Variability and Local Experiments. Chinese Journal of Law, 1.
11. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 15 noyabrya 2018 g. № 2496-r «Ob ustanovlenii kvoty na vydachu inostrannym grazhdanam i licam bez grazhdanstva razreshenij na vremennoe prozhivanie v Rossijskoj Federacii na 2019 god». SZ RF. 2018. № 48. St. 7460. (in Russian)
12. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 22 noyabrya 2017 g. № 2581-r «Ob ustanovlenii kvoty na vydachu inostrannym grazhdanam i licam bez grazhdanstva razreshenij na vremennoe prozhivanie v Rossijskoj Federacii na 2018 god». SZ RF. 2017. № 48. St. 7279. (in Russian)
13. Reitz, K. R. (2005). The New Sentencing Conundrum: Policy and Constitutional Law at Cross-Purposes. Colum. L. Rev., 105, 1082.
14. Safarov, R.A. (1964). Social'nyj ehksperiment i problemy gosudarstva i prava. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i parvo, 10 (In Russian).
15. Ukaz gubernatora Permskogo kraya ot 31 yanvarya 2019 g. № 13 «Ob ustanovlenii na 2019 god zapreta na privlechenie inostrannyh grazhdan, osushchestvlyayushchih trudovuyu deyatel'nost' na territorii Permskogo kraya na osnovanii patentov po vidam ehkonomicheskoj deyatel'nosti». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/ (accessed 30 March 2019).
16. Zagaynova, G. G., Luk'yanchenko, V. V., Novikova, A. E., Tonkov, E. E., & Doronina, O. N. (2018). Inadmissibility of experiments on people: constitutional imperatives of the post-soviet countries. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 7(12), 177-180.
17. Zakon FRG ot 9 iyulya 1990 g. «Ob inostrancah» // БФЗ. Т. 1. С. 1354. Available at: http: // www.immigra.ru/law.html (accessed 19 March 2019).
18. Sheetz, M. P., Felsenfeld, D. P., & Galbraith, C. G. (1998). Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. Trends in cell biology, 8(2), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(98)80005-6
19. Doomernik, J., & Jandl, M. (Eds.). (2008). Modes of migration regulation and control in Europe. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053566893
20. Irving, J. A., & Lala, P. K. (1995). Functional role of cell surface integrins on human trophoblast cell migration: regulation by TGF-β, IGF-II, and IGFBP-1. Experimental cell research, 217(2), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1995.1105
21. Penninx, R., Berger, M., & Kraal, K. (2006). The dynamics of international migration and settlement in Europe. A State of the Art, AUP, IMISCOE Joint Studies series, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053568668

Most read articles by the same author(s)