Main Article Content
network analysis, legal scholarship, intellectual trajectory, structuralism, institutionalization, literature review
Purpose of the study: The aim of this paper is twofold and while one is more analytically conspicuous, another is rather devised to be more connotatively ambitious. As to the former one, it intends to contribute to the literature on the interdisciplinary collaboration between network science and legal science by comprehensively reviewing and discussing the existing literature as well as the relevant academic activities.
Methodology: To achieve its aims, this study primarily adopts the scoping review methodology to map the extant literature and relevant research activities in this emergent area of research. The data solicited for this study was thus qualitative in nature and mainly generated from journal articles, books, book chapters, and conference proceedings on the topic in question. In addition, Internet sources like blog pages and university websites were involved as well.
Main findings: The comprehensive review conducted by this study recognized that the origin, evolution, and development of network studies of law have been in line with the mainstream of network analysis/science, especially in terms of the historical timeline and scope.
Applications of this study: Given the epistemic and pragmatical significance of integrating network thinkings and methods with legislation, adjudication, and implementation, this study is highly relevant and meaningful for both legal practitioners and (socio-)legal academics who obtain the specific intention of updating the landscape of this field.
Novelty/Originality of this study: Against the general backdrop of the increasing number of studies that apply network theories and methods to legal topics, this study is initially novel in the sense that it attempts to uncover the intellectual trajectory of the network analysis in law by reviewing the existing literature and the relevant activities in the academia.
2. Amstutz, M., & Teubner, G. (Eds.). (2009). Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation. Portland: Hart Publishing.
3. Augsberg, I., Viellechner, L., & Zumbansen, P. (2009). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Law of the Network Society. A Tribute to Karl-Heinz Ladeur. German Law Journal, 10(4), 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200001085
4. Berry, F. S., Brower, R. S., Choi, S. O., Goa, W. X., Jang, H., Kwon, M., & Word, J. (2004). Three traditions of network research: What the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00402.x
5. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network Analysis in the Social Sciences. Science, 323(April), 892–896. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
6. Buxbaum, R. M. (1993). Is “Network” a Legal Concept? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149(4), 698–705.
7. Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an Exploratory Theory of the Network Society. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358408
8. Chané, A.-L., & Sharma, A. (2017). Social Network Analysis in Human Rights Research. In B. A. Andreassen, H.-O. Sano, & S. McInerney-Lankford (Eds.), Research Methods in Human Rights: A Handbook (pp. 354–378). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367793.00023
9. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. New York: Little, Brown.
10. Cotterrell, R. (2008). Community as a Legal Concept? Some Uses of a Law-And-Community Approach in Legal Theory. In R. Cotterrell (Ed.), Living Law: Studies in Legal and Social Theory (pp. 17–28). Farnham: Ashgate.
11. Dallara, C., & Amato, R. (2012). Judicial and Legal Expert Networks. New Actors for a EU Area of Justice? In National Courts vis-a-vis EU Law: New Issues, Theories & Methods, European University Insitute (pp. 1–3).
12. de Visser, M., & Claes, M. (2013). Judicial Networks. In P. Larouche & P. Cserne (Eds.), National Legal Systems and Globalization (pp. 345–370). The Hague: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-885-9_13
13. Dothan, S. (2018). Social Networks and the Enforcement of International Law. In M. Hirsch & A. Lang (Eds.), Research Handbook on the Sociology of International Law (pp. 333–346). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474493.00023
14. Druey, J. N. (2009). The Path to the Law - The Difficult Legal Access of Networks. In M. Amstutz & G. Teubner (Eds.), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation (pp. 87–102). Portland: Hart Publishing.
15. Druzin, B. (2009). Buying Commercial Law: Choice of Law, Choice of Forum, and Network Externalities. Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 18, 131.
16. Economides, N. (1996). The Economics of Networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(September 1994), 673–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(96)01015-6
17. Erickson, M. (2012). Network as Metaphor. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 5(2), 912–921.
18. Freeman, L. (2011). The Development of Social Network Analysis - With an Emphasis on Recent Events. The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.010
19. Gallagher, J. J., & Anderson, C. W. (1999). Designing, implementing, and reporting research: The significant role of literature review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 619–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<619::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-B
20. Hafner-Burton, E. M., Kahler, M., & Montgomery, A. H. (2009). Network Analysis for International Relations. International Organization, 63(3), 559–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090195
21. Harris, P. (1982). Structural Change in the Communication of Precedent among State Supreme Courts, 1870-1970. Social Networks, 4, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(82)90021-1
22. Katz, D. M., & Stafford, D. K. (2010). Hustle and Flow: A Social Network Analysis of the American Federal Judiciary. Ohio State Law Journal, 71(3), 457–507.
23. Kemmerer, A. (2009). The Normative Knot 2.0: Metaphorological Explorations in the Net of Networks. German Law Journal, 10(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200001152
24. Kjaer, P. F. (2009). Embeddedness through Network: A Critical Appraisal of the Network Concept in the Oeuvre of Karl-Heinz Ladeur. German Law Journal, 10(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200001176
25. Knox, H., Savage, M., & Harvey, P. (2006). Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, 35(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500465899
26. Koniaris, M., Anagnostopoulos, I., & Vassiliou, Y. (2014). Legislation as a Complex Network: Modeling and Analysis of European Union Legal Sources. In R. Hoekstra (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (Vol. 5, pp. 143--143-). IOS Press.
27. Ladeur, K.-H. (1997). Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality - The Viability of the Network Concept. European Law Journal, 3(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00018
28. Ladeur, K.-H. (2007). The Role of Contracts and Networks in Public Governance: The Importance of the Social Epistemology" of Decision Making. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 14(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2007.14.2.329
29. Latour, B. (2011). Networks, Societies, Spheres: Reflections of an Actor- Network Theorist. International Journal of Communication, 5(February), 796–810.
30. Levi, R., & Valverde, M. (2008). Studying Law by Association: Bruno Latour Goes to the Conseil d’État. Law & Social Inquiry, 33(3), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00122.x
31. Lewis, T. G. (2009). Network Science: Theory and Practice. Wiley Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400791
32. Ogus, A. (2011). Legal Systems as Networks. In M. Faure & J. Smits (Eds.), Does Law Matter?: On Law and Economic Growth (pp. 165–177). Cambridge: Intersentia.
33. Petersen, N., & Towfigh, E. V. (2017). Network Analysis and Legal Scholarship. German Law Journal, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022124
34. Puig, S. (2018). Network Analysis and the Sociology of International Law. In M. Hirsch & A. Lang (Eds.), Research Handbook on the Sociology of International Law (pp. 319–332). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783474493.00022
35. Slaughter, A.-M. (2003). A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal, 44(1), 191–219.
36. Smith, T. A. C. (2005). The web of law. San Diego Legal Studies Research Paper, 6(11), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.642863
37. Tam Cho, W. K., & Fowler, J. H. (2010). Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation. Journal of Politics, 72(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160999051X
38. Teubner, G. (2009a). And if I by Beelzebub Cast out Devils,...": An Essay on the Diabolics of Network Failure. German Law Journal, 10(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200001139
39. Teubner, G. (2009b). Coincidentia Oppositorum: Hybrid Networks Beyond Contract and Organisation. In M. Amstutz & G. Teubner (Eds.), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation (pp. 3–30). Portland: Hart Publishing.
40. Victor, J. N., Ringe, N., & Haptonstahl, S. (2013). Multiplex Legislative Networks and the Power of Caucuses to Alleviate Partisan Polarization. Working Papers 69. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/pn_wp/69
41. Watts, D. J. (2004). The “New” Science of Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
42. Whalen, R. (2016). Legal Networks: The Promises and Challenges of Legal Network Analysis. Michigan State Law Review, 539–565.
43. Winkels, R., & Lettieri, N. (Eds.). (2014). 2nd International Workshop on “Network Analysis in Law.” Retrieved from http://www.leibnizcenter.org/~winkels/NAiL2014-pre-proceedings.pdf