Main Article Content
Perceived Usefulness, Relative Advantage, Perceived Ease of Use, Fingerprint system, on-value added practices
Purpose: The aim of this study is to assist the Malaysian electronics companies in reducing the non-value added practices and in return, will minimize the cost and improves productivity with the use of the fingerprint system.
Methodology: This study uses a quantitative research approach and data were sampled from 137 front-line employees using simple random sampling technique.
Result: The empirical findings of the study confirm that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly affect the intention to use the fingerprint system. However, there was not enough evidence that relative advantage has any effect on the intention to use the system.
Implications: The study results affirmed that business organizations, especially electronic companies should transform their use of conventional attendance system to fingerprint system in improving efficiencies and effectiveness within the human resource practices.
2. Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P. P., & Williams, M. D. (2016). Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0035
3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411
4. Arif, A., Li, T., & Cheng, C. H. (2017). Blurred fingerprint image enhancement: algorithm analysis and performance evaluation. Signal, Image and Video Processing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-017-1218-0
5. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
6. Byun, S., & Byun, S. E. (2013). Exploring perceptions toward biometric technology in service encounters: A comparison of current users and potential adopters. Behaviour and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.553741
7. Chew, J., & Chan, C. C. (2008). Human resource practices, organizational commitment and intention to stay. International journal of manpower, 29(6), 503-522.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
8. Choudhary, P. K., & Nagaraja, H. N. (2017). Measuring Agreement: Models, Methods, and Applications (Vol. 891). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118553282
9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
10. Davis, F.D, Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P, R. (1989). "Use acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, 35, 982 – 1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
11. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. MIS quarterly, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
12. Dooley, K. J. (2011). Organizational psychology. In Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058544.015
13. Eriksson, K., Kerem, K., & Nilsson, D. (2005). Customer acceptance of internet banking in Estonia. International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320510584412Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320510584412
14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39 –50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
15. Guriting, P., & Oly Ndubisi, N. (2006). Borneo online banking: Evaluating customer perceptions and behavioural intention. Management Research News. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610645402
16. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
17. Hair J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
18. Hair, J. F. (2007). Research methods for business.
19. Hair, J. F. Jr., Money, A.H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2007). Research methods for business. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wilet & Sons, Inc.
20. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
21. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
22. Hernandez, J. M. C., & Mazzon, J. A. (2007). Adoption of internet banking: proposition and implementation of an integrated methodology approach. International Journal of Bank Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320710728410
23. Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124183011003003
24. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
25. Hamid, A. A., Razak, F. Z. A., Bakar, A. A., & Abdullah, W. S. W. (2016). The Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Continuance Intention to Use E-Government. Procedia Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00079-4
26. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6
27. Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498
28. James, T., Pirim, T., & Boswell, K. (2006). Determining the intention to use biometric devices: An application and extension of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781599042954.ch005
29. Jain, A. K., Ross, A., & Prabhakar, S. (2004). An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 14(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2003.818349
30. Jiang, P., Zhang, Y., Fu, W., Liu, H., & Su, X. (2015). Indoor mobile localization based on Wi-Fi fingerprint’s important access point. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/429104
31. John W. Bond. (2009). The value of fingerprint evidence in detecting crime. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2009.11.1.111
32. Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1-39.
33. Kepha, A. O. (2015). Influence of Human Resource Management Practices on the Performance of Employees in Research Institutes in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation).
34. Kline, R.B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.
35. Kumar, N.R. & Krishnaveni, R. (2008). Role of HRD practices in building organizational commitment, Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, April-June, 59-68.
36. Kucukusta, D., Law, R., Besbes, A., & Legohérel, P. (2015). Re-examining perceived usefulness and ease of use in online booking the case of Hong Kong online users. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2013-0413
37. Lancelot Miltgen, C., Popovič, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.010
38. Lee, H. C., Ramotowski, R., & Gaensslen, R. E. (Eds.). (2001). Advances in fingerprint technology. CRC press.
39. Lian, L. K., & Tui, L. G. (2012). The mediating effect of downward influence tactics on the relationship between leadership style and organizational citizenship behavior. Jurnal Pengurusan.
40. Mattila, M. (2015). Factors affecting the adoption of mobile banking services. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2003.
41. McEvoy, T. G., Robinson, J. J., Aitken, R. P., Findlay, P. A., & Robertson, I. S. (1997). Dietary excesses of urea influence the viability and metabolism of preimplantation sheep embryos and may affect fetal growth among survivors. Animal reproduction science, 47(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(96)01627-2
42. McGrath, R. G., Tsai, M.-H., Venkataraman, S., & MacMillan, I. C. (1996). Innovation, Competitive Advantage and Rent: A Model and Test. Management Science, 42(3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.389. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.3.389
43. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
44. O’Gorman, L., & Chatham, N. J. (1999). 2 Fingerprint Verification. Personal Identification in Networked Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32659-7
45. O'Hair, D., Friedrich, G. W., & Dixon, L. D. (2007). Strategic communication in business and the professions. Allyn & Bacon.
46. Ogbanufe, O., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Comparing fingerprint-based biometrics authentication versus traditional authentication methods for e-payment. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.11.003
47. Pankanti, S., Prabhakar, S., & Jain, A. K. (2002). On the individuality of fingerprints. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1023799
48. Park, H. M. (2015). Univariate analysis and normality test using SAS, Stata, and SPSS.
49. Paul, A. K., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2004). Influence of HRM practices on organizational commitment: A study among software professionals in India.Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1088
50. Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. (1986). "Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects " Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
51. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003) “Common methods biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies," Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
52. Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of business strategy, 5(3), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039075
53. Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
54. Ramayah, T., Yeap, J. A. L., & Ignatius, J. (2013). An Empirical Inquiry on Knowledge Sharing Among Academicians in Higher Learning Institutions. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9229-7
55. Ratha, N., & Bolle, R. (Eds.). (2007). Automatic fingerprint recognition systems. Springer Science & Business Media.
56. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations-Fourth Edition. Everett M. Rogers. https://doi.org/citeulike-article- id:126680
57. Rogers, E. M. (2015). Evolution: Diffusion of Innovations. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.81064-8
58. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Theoretical framework In theoretical framework and hypothesis development. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, United Kingdom: Wiley, 80.
59. Silaparasetti, V., Srinivasarao, G. V. R., & Khan, F. R. (2017). Structural Equation Modeling Analysis Using Smart Pls To Assess The Occupational Health And Safety (Ohs) Factors On Workers’behavior. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 5(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2017.524
60. Soh, K. L., Wongand, W. P., & Chan, K. L. (2010). Adoption of biometric technology in online applications. International Journal of Business and Management Science.
61. Teo, T. S., Lim, G. S., & Fedric, S. A. (2007). The adoption and diffusion of human resources information systems in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45(1), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411107075402
62. Thomas, M. (2004). Is Malaysia's Mykad the One Card to Rule Them All-The Urgent Need to Develop a Proper Legal Framework for the Protection of Personal Information in Malaysia. Melb. UL Rev., 28, 474.
63. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS quarterly, 125-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/249443
64. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
65. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.116
66. Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H., & Tang, T. I. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. In International Journal of Service Industry Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310500192
67. Weiers, R. M. (2008). Introduction to Statistics.
68. Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
69. Zikmund, G., Babin, B. J., & Carr, J. C. M. Griffin (2010). Business Research Method.
70. Zikmund, W. G., McLeod, R., & Gilbert, F. W. (2003). Customer relationship management: Integrating marketing strategy and information technology. New York, NY: Wiley.