Main Article Content
information, consciousness, interdisciplinary research strategy, topological approach, formation network society, synergetic paradigm, positive construction of social reality, security
Purpose: The aim of the present article is to identify new dangers and threats posed by the state of peaceful war, which is inherent in the information network society, as well as corresponding to these threats’ new aspects of Russia's national security.
Methodology: As research methodology we use an interdisciplinary research strategy, a topological approach, a synergy paradigm, the concept of the Internet of things, the theory of cultural-historical psychology, the concept of positive construction of social reality, propositions of quantum sociology, the concept of “peaceful war” (“hybrid war”, “multidimensional war”), strategies and methods for implementing the systemic nature of Russia's national security.
Result: The result is that new aspects of Russia's national security, connected with the “peaceful war”, peculiarities of the impact of new information and communication technologies (ICT) and the Internet of Things as a global computing system (network of networks) on human consciousness, giving specific features to the system of security, and, first of all, its information, psychological, military, cultural and educational components, are shown for the first time.
Applications: The application of interdisciplinary, topological and synergistic approaches makes it possible to find out the peculiarities of the impact of ICT and Internet of Things on human consciousness, which functions in accordance with the Mobius band metaphor.
Novelty/Originality: The scientific novelty consists in an attempt to apply the concept of “peaceful war”, encompassing all spheres of public life, in order to develop an adequate system for ensuring Russia's national security.
2. Bartosh, A.A. (2019). The fog of hybrid war. Uncertainties and risks of conflicts of the 21st century. Moscow: Telecom hotline.
3. Cebrovski, A. (2000). Network-Centric Warfare and information Superiority. London: RUSI. Whitehall.
4. Cebrovski, A., and Gartska, J. (1998). Network-Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future. Proceedings. January, 1: 24-35.
5. Chernyavskaya, Y.S., Kiselev, S.V., Rassolov, I.M., Kurushin, V.V., and Chernikova, L.I., Faizova G.R. (2016). Assessment of the main indicators' relationship of projects of information and communication services' development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(15): 7348-7357.
6. Chimarov, S.Yu. (2016). On the issue of the network-centric format of the 21st century hybrid war. Consulting in management, 2: 97-102.
7. Cuevas, O., Larios, V., Peralta, J. X., & Jiménez, A. R. (2018). Mathematical Knowledge of Students who Aspire to Enroll in Engineering Programs. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3832
8. Feresin, C., & Močinić, S. (2017). DO WE NEED TO TRAIN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS TO CARE ABOUT OTHER LIVING BEINGS? Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 5(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2017.513
9. Gilev, A. (2015). Multidimensional war and new defense strategy // Russia in global politics. New rules of the game without rules. Moscow: LLC “Eksmo Publishing".
10. Hoffman, F.G. (2006). How Marines are Preparing for Hybrid Wars. Armed Forces Journal. March, 2: 253-265.
11. Hoffman, F.G. (2009). Hybrid Warfare and Challenges. Joint Force Quarterly, 52: 34-39.
12. Kaldor, M. (2012). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity.
13. Komleva, I.A. (2015). Consciental war: global trends in global confrontation. Space and time, 3: 15-23.
14. Korableva, V.Yu. (2012). Information wars in the modern world. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Ser. Historical and political science, 25(658): 104-115.
15. Kurginyan, S. (1995). Conceptual security and its role for Russia in the 21st century. Russia XXI, 1: 11-12.
16. Kutuev, R.A., Katicheva, M.G., Rassolov, I.M., Derdizova, F.V., Yevgrafova, O.G., and Kozhanov, I.V. (2016). Practical recommendations on students' tolerant behavior formation in universities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(17): 10365-10376.
17. Kuznetsova, N.V., Soloviev, A.A., Botasheva, L.K., Lebedev, I.A., Sarkisyan, K.S., Kurdyumov, V.I., Chistyakov, K.A., and Prokopyev, A.I. (2018). Bachelors safety culture formation in the field of environmental protection. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 12(2): 157-166.
18. Larina, E.S., and Ovchinsky, V.S. (2015). Peaceful war. Everyone against everyone. The latest concepts of the Anglo-Saxons combat operations. Drafting, introduction, conclusion. Moscow: Knizhny mir.
19. Lind, W.L., Nightingale, K., Schmitt, J.F., Sutton, J.W., and Wilson, G.I. (1989). The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation. Marine Corps Gazette. October, 1: 353-366.
20. Odom, W. E. (1988). Soviet Military Doctrine. Foreign Aff., 67, 114. https://doi.org/10.2307/20043776
21. Ayoob, M. (1995). The third world security predicament: State making, regional conflict, and the international system (pp. 41-42). L. Rienner Publishers.
22. KATZENSTEIN, M. F. (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.