EVALUATIVE FUNCTIONS OF REPORTING VERBS IN THE INTRODUCTIONS OF MASTER THESES

Main Article Content

Muna Abdualhussein Swear
Seyed Ali Rezvani Kalajahi

Keywords

Evaluative Functions, Reporting Verbs, Master Theses

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study has unearthed the serious challenges faced postgraduate students in the University of Technology in either over-using or miss-using of some reporting verbs which make their work monotonous and repetitive


Methodology: The study is based on a small corpus consisting of the Introduction (henceforth LR) in 3 master theses written by students from the University of Technology who finished their Master's degree in engineering. It is important to mention here that the term” writer” is used to refer to the master student who is reporting information and ideas of the previous studies written in the same field and the term “source” refers to the person who is being reported as a reference in the study. 


Results: The analysis revealed the students' preference to use factive verbs more than non-factive verbs; however, they are non-willing to use counter-factive verbs in writing the Introductions. This indicates their inability to challenge existing knowledge in the field effectively.


Applications of this study: This research can be used for the universities, teachers, and students.


Novelty/Originality of this study: In this research, the model of the Evaluative Functions of Reporting Verbs in the Introductions of Master Theses is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 25 | PDF Downloads 25 XML Downloads 2 ePUB Downloads 4

References

1. Gray, B. E. (2011). Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University).
2. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied linguistics, 20(3), 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
3. Hyland, K. (2014). Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. In Academic discourse (pp. 125-140). Routledge.
4. Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.004
5. Mapako, F. P. (2013) The art of attribution in academic writing at university level: A case study of Great Zimbabwe University.
6. Thompson, G., & Yiyun, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied linguistics, 12(4), 365-382. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365
7. Loan, N. T. T., & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Citation in Vietnamese TESOL: Analysis of master’s thesis introduction chapters. The Asian ESP Journal, 2(1), 95-120.
8. Petrić, B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high-and low-rated master's theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 238-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.002
9. Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master's theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001
10. Loan, N. T. T., & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Reporting Verbs in Literature Review Chapters of Tesol Master’s Theses Written by Vietnamese Postgraduates. ESP TODAY-JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AT TERTIARY LEVEL, 3(2), 196-215.
11. Xie, J. (2016). Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
12. Williams, I. A. (1996). A contextual study of lexical verbs in two types of medical research report: clinical and experimental. English for Specific Purposes, 15(3), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(96)00010-5
13. Loan, N. T. T. Reporting Verbs in TESOL Master’s Theses Written by Vietnamese Postgraduate Students.
14. Santos, J. A. L. (2018). On Political Science Students’ Academic Prose: Reporting Verbs in the Undergraduate Thesis Literature Review. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University (Humanities, Social Sciences and arts), 11(5), 248-259.
15. Swales, J. M. (2014). Variation in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers: From parenthetical plonking to intertextual storytelling. Written Communication, 31(1), 118-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088 313515166
16. Gol, A. K., Hezareh, B. G., & Soghondikolaei, E. M. (2014). A contrastive study of rhetorical functions of citation in Iranian and international ELT Scopus journals. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 2(6), 155-165.
17. Hu, G., & Wang, G. (2014). Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001
18. Sawaki, T. (2014). On the function of stance-neutral formulations: Apparent neutrality as a powerful stance constructing resource. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 81-92. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jeap.2014.10.001
19. Doró, K. (2014). Citation practices in EFL undergraduate theses: a focus on reporting verbs. UPRT 2013: Empirical Studies in English Applied Linguistics, 32.
20. Olohan, M., & Baker, M. (2000). Reporting that in translated English. Evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation?. Across languages and cultures, 1(2), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.1.2000.2.1
21. Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research Article Abstracts in Two Related Disciplines: Rhetorical Variation between Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p84