A STUDY ON GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT IN BODOLAND TERRITORIAL AREA DISTRICTS OF ASSAM IN INDIA

Main Article Content

Nicodim Basumatary
Bhagirathi Panda

Keywords

Governance, Development, Administration, Public Service Delivery, Political, Bodoland Territorial Area District

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The study examines the relationship between the quality of governance and level of development in the Bodoland Territorial Area District (BTAD) of Assam in India. It also assesses which dimensions of governance influence the level of development.


Methodology: The study is based on the data collected from a field survey of 400 households in both rural and urban areas of BTAD. Important dimensions pertaining to measuring the quality of governance is a broad manifestation in several institutions such as Political, Legal and Judicial, Administration and Public service delivery, and Economic and Social. Similarly, we measure development in terms of economic, social and empowerment dimensions. The study uses statistical techniques of Correlation and CHAID analysis.


Main findings: The study finds that the quality of governance is critical to development. Amongst other factors, efficient system and management of political institutions and effective administration and public service delivery is the key to enhancement of economic development.


Social Implications: The study depicts disparity with respect to social and economic space; and suggests inclusive participation in political and fine-tuning in the front of administration and delivery of public services.


Originality/Novelty of the study: The study brings out the dynamics of deficit of governance and its impact on economic development at the level of the sub-national state. It further confirms and substantially contributes to the literature on development – governance nexus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract 62 | PDF Downloads 53 XML Downloads 1 ePUB Downloads 4

References

1. Banerjee, A., & Lakshmi, I. (2005). History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1190-1213. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825574
2. Basu, S. R. (2002). Does Governance Matter? Some Evidence from Indian States. Paper presented at VII Spring Meeting of Young Economists Paris, France, April 2. Retrieved from https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/dev/papers/0509/0509008.pdf
3. Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2011). Pillars of Prosperity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691152684.001.0001
4. Blaydes, L. & Mark, A. K. (2011). Counting Calories: Democracy and Distribution in the Developing World. .International Studies Quarterly, 55(4), 887-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00692.x
5. Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) Accord (2003). Retrieved from http://cdpsindia.org/btc_accord.asp
6. Charmes, J., & Saskia, W. (2003). Measuring Women's Empowerment: An Assessment of the Gender-related Development Index and the Gender Empowerment Measure. Journal of Human Development, 4(3), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464988032000125773
7. Cheung, C., & Kwan-kwok, L. (2007). Enhancing Life Satisfaction by Government Accountability in China. Social indicators research, 82(3), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9043-9
8. Court, J. (2003). Assessing and Analysing Governance in India: Evidence from a New
Survey. World Governance Survey, July. Retrieved from http://archive.unu.edu/p&g/wga/publicatio ns/governance_in_India.
9. D'Ambrosio, C., Joachim R. F., & Markus, J. (2009). Satisfaction with Life and Economic Well-being: Evidence from Germany. SchmollersJahrbuch, 129(2) 283-295. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.129.2.283
10. Department of Administrative Reforms, Public Grievances & Pensions (D.A.R.P.P) (2009). State of Governance: A Framework of Assessment. Government of India, New Delhi. Retrieved from https://darpg.gov.in/sites/default/files/sogr_framework.pdf
11. Diener, E., & Eunkook, S. (1997). Measuring Quality of Life: Economic, Social, and Subjective Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1-2), 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006859511756
12. Fereidouni, G. H., Youhanna, N., & Reza, E. A. (2013). Do Governance Factors Matter for Happiness in the MENA Region?.International Journal of Social Economics, 40(12), 1028-1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2012-0208
13. Gasparini, L., Walter, S. E., Mariana, M., & Sergio, O. (2008). Income, Deprivation, and Perceptions in Latin America and the Caribbean: New evidence from the Gallup World Poll.Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved fromhttps://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/10696/income-deprivation-and-perceptions-latin-america-and-caribbean-new-evidence
14. Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries. Governance, 17(4), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
15. Headey, B., & Mark, W. (2004). The Effects of Wealth and Income on Subjective Well‐being and Ill‐being,” IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1032, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA): Bonn. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp1032.pdf
16. Helliwell, J. F., Haifang, H., Shawn, G., and Shun, W. (2014). Good Governance and National Well-being. OECD Working Paperson Public Governance, No. 25: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/good-governance-and-national-well-being_5jxv9f651hvj-en
17. Heukamp, F. H., & Miguel, A. A. (2011). Does Country Matter for Subjective Well-being?.Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9610-y
18. IBM SPSS (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0.
19. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3) 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
20. Khan, M. (2008). Governance and Development: the Perspective of Growth-Enhancing Governance. GRIPS Development Forum/National Graduate Institute for Policy Studie. Retrieved from https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/9853/1/GRIPS.pdf
21. Kim, S., & Donggeun, K. (2012). Does Government make People Happy?: Exploring New Research Directions for Government’s Rroles in Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(5), 875-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9296-0
22. Kishor, S., & Kamla, G. (2004). Women's Empowerment in India and its States: Evidence from the NFHS. Economic and Political weekly, 39(7), 694-712.
23. Kurtz, M. J., & Andrew, S. (2007). Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 538-554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00549.x
24. Kuypers, S. (2018). Two Sides of the Same Coin? An Investigation into the Joint Distribution of Income and Wealth and its Applications to the Analysis of Poverty, Inequality and Redistribution. PhD diss., University of Antwerp. Retrieved from https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/871722/155611.pdf
25. Lora, E., Juan, C. C. & María, V. R. (2008). Satisfaction beyond Income. In Eduardo, L. (Ed.), Beyond Facts: Understanding Quality of Life. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank
26. Lou, D. (2009). Marching Toward a Harmonious Society: Happiness, Regime Satisfaction, and Government Performance in Contemporary Urban China. Asian Politics & Policy, 1(3), 508-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-0787.2009.01137.x
27. Mahmud, S., & Tasneem, S. (2014). Measuring ‘Empowerment’ using Quantitative Household Survey Data. Women's Studies International Forum,45, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.11.009
28. Mathew, C.K., Dutta, U., Narayanan, A. & Jalodia, S. (2017). Public Affairs Index: Governance in the States of India. Bangalore: Public Affairs Center.
29. Mathur, K. (2015). From Government to Governance: A Brief Survey of the Indian Experience. New Delhi: National Book Trust, India.
30. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
31. Milanović, M., & Milan, S. (2016). CHAID Decision Tree: Methodological Frame and Application. Economic Themes, 54(4), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2016-0029
32. Ministry of Home Affairs (2011). Census (2011). Government of India, New Delhi.
33. Møller, V., & Amanda, J. (1997). Perceptions of Service Delivery and Happiness. Development Southern Africa,14(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768359708439958
34. Mundle, S., Pinaki, C., Samik, C., &Satadru, S. (2016). Governance Performance of Indian States. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(36), 55-64.
35. Oster, E. (2009). Does Increased Access Increase Equality? Gender and Child Health Investments in India. Journal of Development Economics, 89(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.07.003
36. Ott, J. C. (2011). Government and Happiness in 130 Nations: Good Governance Fosters Higher Level and More Equality of Happiness. Social Indicators Research,102(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9719-z
37. Rajkumar, A. S., & Vinaya, S. (2008). Public Spending and Outcomes: Does Governance Matter?.Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 96-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.003
38. Rodríguez-Pose, A., &Kristin,a M. (2011). Can Policy Make Us Happier? Individual Characteristics, Socio-economic Factors and Life Satisfaction in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 5(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsr038
39. Rodrik, D., Arvind, S., & Francesco, T. (2004). Institutions Rule: the Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
40. Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
41. Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland
42. Sen, A. (1988). The Concept of Development. In H. Chenery and T.N. Srinivasan (Ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 9-26.
43. Shariff, A. (2017). District Development and Diversity Index: A Methodology That Promotes Evaluation and Assessment of Development and Welfare Programmes in India. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 2(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133316676415
44. Tavits, M. (2008). Representation, Corruption, and Subjective Well-being. Comparative Political Studies,41(12), 1607-1630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007308537
45. UNDP (1997). Governance and Sustainable Human Development. United Nations Development Programme, New York.
46. Virmani, A., Sanghamitra, S., &Suchitra, T. (2006). Governance in the Provision of Public Goods in South Asia. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations: New Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.sanei-network.net/uploads/research/governance-in-the-provision-of-public-goods-in-south-asia1464328569.pdf
47. World Bank (1992). Governance and Development. World Bank: Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-2094-7